FDTTX vs. VYM
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM).
FDTTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 30, 1999. VYM is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. It was launched on Feb 7, 2019.
Performance
FDTTX vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDTTX vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTTX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A | -2.04% | 27.28% | 26.68% | 23.86% | -8.28% | 24.97% | 8.84% | 30.98% | -9.36% | 16.36% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 3.69% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDTTX achieves a -2.04% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 3.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FDTTX has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 14.73%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.22% annualized return.
FDTTX
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- -5.26%
- YTD
- -2.04%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 27.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.45%
- 5Y*
- 14.64%
- 10Y*
- 14.73%
VYM
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.02%
- YTD
- 3.69%
- 6M
- 6.19%
- 1Y
- 17.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDTTX vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDTTX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDTTX vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
FDTTX
VYM
FDTTX vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDTTX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.49 | 1.19 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 1.70 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 1.56 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.27 | 6.86 | +3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDTTX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.19 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.79 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.69 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.49 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTTX and VYM is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDTTX vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
FDTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.99%, more than VYM's 2.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTTX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A | 10.99% | 10.77% | 9.20% | 4.34% | 5.64% | 5.60% | 4.40% | 7.49% | 16.04% | 5.52% | 2.74% | 5.82% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.37% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Drawdowns
FDTTX vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTTX drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, roughly equal to the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTTX and VYM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTTX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.00% | -56.98% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -11.32% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -15.84% | -6.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.62% | -35.21% | -1.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.72% | -4.91% | -1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -7.25% | -3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.57% | +0.16% |
Volatility
FDTTX vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.60%. This indicates that FDTTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDTTX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 3.60% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 7.96% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.64% | 15.14% | +3.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 13.97% | +3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 16.33% | +2.52% |