FDTTX vs. FAGAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX).
FDTTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 30, 1999. FAGAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
FDTTX vs. FAGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDTTX vs. FAGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTTX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A | -5.13% | 27.28% | 26.68% | 23.86% | -8.28% | 24.97% | 8.84% | 30.98% | -9.36% | 16.36% |
FAGAX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A | -13.66% | 22.17% | 38.71% | 45.14% | -38.40% | 11.31% | 68.60% | 40.26% | 14.87% | 34.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDTTX achieves a -5.13% return, which is significantly higher than FAGAX's -13.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FDTTX has underperformed FAGAX with an annualized return of 14.37%, while FAGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.64% annualized return.
FDTTX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -8.10%
- YTD
- -5.13%
- 6M
- -0.30%
- 1Y
- 23.71%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 14.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.37%
FAGAX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -9.95%
- YTD
- -13.66%
- 6M
- -12.33%
- 1Y
- 18.39%
- 3Y*
- 22.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 18.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDTTX vs. FAGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDTTX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FAGAX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDTTX vs. FAGAX — Risk / Return Rank
FDTTX
FAGAX
FDTTX vs. FAGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDTTX | FAGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 0.75 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 1.19 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.17 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 0.93 | +0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.04 | 3.40 | +4.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDTTX | FAGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 0.75 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.30 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.79 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.45 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTTX and FAGAX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDTTX vs. FAGAX - Dividend Comparison
FDTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.35%, more than FAGAX's 4.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTTX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A | 11.35% | 10.77% | 9.20% | 4.34% | 5.64% | 5.60% | 4.40% | 7.49% | 16.04% | 5.52% | 2.74% | 5.82% |
FAGAX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A | 4.76% | 4.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.19% | 5.45% | 4.10% | 11.99% | 7.67% | 15.44% | 11.12% |
Drawdowns
FDTTX vs. FAGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTTX drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, smaller than the maximum FAGAX drawdown of -65.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTTX and FAGAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTTX | FAGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.00% | -65.24% | +7.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -16.19% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -44.70% | +22.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.62% | -44.70% | +8.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.65% | -16.19% | +6.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -15.27% | +4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 4.43% | -1.73% |
Volatility
FDTTX vs. FAGAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) is 4.49%, while Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that FDTTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDTTX | FAGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 6.78% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 14.04% | -4.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.41% | 24.01% | -5.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 24.80% | -7.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 23.78% | -4.95% |