FGSI vs. CIBR
FGSI (First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGSI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. FGSI is actively managed, while CIBR is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGSI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
FGSI vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGSI achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return.
FGSI
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 4.99%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 31.43%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
FGSI vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FGSI First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF | 4.99% | 4.53% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.52% | -4.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGSI and CIBR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.64 |
FGSI vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGSI
CIBR
Technology
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FGSI
CIBR
Healthcare
FGSI
CIBR
-
Financial Services
FGSI
CIBR
-
Consumer Cyclical
FGSI
CIBR
-
Industrials
FGSI
CIBR
Communication Services
FGSI
CIBR
Energy
FGSI
CIBR
-
Consumer Defensive
FGSI
CIBR
-
Basic Materials
FGSI
CIBR
-
Real Estate
FGSI
-
CIBR
-
Utilities
FGSI
-
CIBR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGSI vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
FGSI
CIBR
FGSI vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGSI | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.67 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
FGSI vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGSI drawdown since its inception was -8.25%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSI and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGSI | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -33.89% | +25.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -2.81% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -8.66% | +6.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.25% | — |
Volatility
FGSI vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGSI | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.43% | 24.50% | -12.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.43% | 24.95% | -12.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.43% | 23.60% | -11.17% |
FGSI vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGSI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGSI vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
FGSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.45% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
FGSI First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF | 7.57% | 4.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGSI and CIBR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FGSI.
FGSI has the higher dividend yield at 7.57%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.
FGSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while CIBR is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FGSI and 0.60% for CIBR.
Find the right allocation for FGSI and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer