FGRU vs. NVDQ
FGRU (T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF) and NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGRU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR), while NVDQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. FGRU is passively managed, while NVDQ is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. FGRU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDQ.
Performance
FGRU vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FGRU
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -32.84%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDQ
- 1D
- -3.82%
- 1M
- -23.21%
- YTD
- -38.57%
- 6M
- -41.67%
- 1Y
- -69.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGRU vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FGRU T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF | -48.50% |
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | -34.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGRU and NVDQ is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | -0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGRU vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank
FGRU
NVDQ
FGRU vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF (FGRU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGRU | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | -0.89 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
FGRU vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGRU drawdown since its inception was -57.59%, smaller than the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRU and NVDQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGRU | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.59% | -99.45% | +41.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -73.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.89% | -99.38% | +49.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.86% | -88.22% | +57.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 48.77% | — |
Volatility
FGRU vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGRU | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 51.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 208.42% | 67.77% | +140.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 208.42% | 95.47% | +112.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 208.42% | 95.47% | +112.95% |
FGRU vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGRU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDQ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGRU vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison
FGRU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FGRU T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 0.42% | 0.26% | 4.59% | 11.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGRU and NVDQ have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDQ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDQ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for FGRU.
NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for FGRU.
FGRU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDQ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for FGRU and 1.05% for NVDQ.
Find the right allocation for FGRU and NVDQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer