PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGRU vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGRU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF (FGRU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FGRU

1D
-6.91%
1M
-29.87%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
9.00%
1M
30.35%
YTD
562.84%
6M
362.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGRU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FGRU and LINT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGRU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF (FGRU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FGRU vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGRULINTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

24.05

-24.48

Drawdowns

FGRU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRU drawdown since its inception was -57.59%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRU and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGRULINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.59%

-49.54%

-8.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.37%

-26.55%

-24.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.60%

-20.51%

-10.09%

Volatility

FGRU vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGRULINTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

209.78%

163.04%

+46.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

209.78%

163.04%

+46.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

209.78%

163.04%

+46.74%

FGRU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGRU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

FGRU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FGRU and LINT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for FGRU.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for FGRU.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for FGRU and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGRU and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer