FGRO vs. SCHG
FGRO (Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGRO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. FGRO is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FGRO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
FGRO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FGRO
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 16.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.63%
FGRO vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FGRO Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF | -1.24% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -2.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGRO and SCHG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2026 | 0.28 |
FGRO vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGRO
SCHG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
FGRO
SCHG
Communication Services
FGRO
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
FGRO
SCHG
Healthcare
FGRO
SCHG
Industrials
FGRO
SCHG
Financial Services
FGRO
SCHG
Basic Materials
FGRO
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
FGRO
SCHG
Real Estate
FGRO
SCHG
Utilities
FGRO
SCHG
Energy
FGRO
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGRO vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
FGRO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHG
FGRO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF (FGRO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGRO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGRO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGRO drawdown since its inception was -1.24%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRO and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGRO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | -34.59% | +33.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -6.57% | +5.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -5.20% | +4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.03% | — |
Volatility
FGRO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGRO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.18% | 16.21% | -9.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.18% | 22.38% | -15.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.18% | 21.58% | -14.40% |
FGRO vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGRO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGRO vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
FGRO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGRO Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGRO and SCHG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FGRO.
SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for FGRO.
FGRO is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGRO and 0.04% for SCHG.
Find the right allocation for FGRO and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer