PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGRO vs. FMIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FGRO vs. FMIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF (FGRO) and Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FGRO vs. FMIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FGRO
Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF
-5.74%19.61%32.29%49.71%-37.86%1.72%
FMIL
Fidelity New Millennium ETF
-2.68%17.67%27.89%25.07%-0.04%19.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGRO achieves a -7.11% return, which is significantly lower than FMIL's -2.68% return.


FGRO

1D
4.82%
1M
-5.34%
YTD
-7.11%
6M
-5.65%
1Y
25.80%
3Y*
23.70%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*

FMIL

1D
1.02%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-2.68%
6M
0.18%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
14.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FGRO vs. FMIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FGRO and FMIL have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Return for Risk

FGRO vs. FMIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGRO

FMIL
FMIL Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FMIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMIL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FMIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMIL Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGRO vs. FMIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF (FGRO) and Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGROFMILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

1.07

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

1.60

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.72

+0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.42

7.35

-0.93

FGRO vs. FMIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the FMIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGRO and FMIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGROFMILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

1.07

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.87

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

1.05

-0.79

Correlation

The correlation between FGRO and FMIL is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FGRO vs. FMIL - Dividend Comparison

FGRO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FGRO
Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF
0.16%0.14%0.09%0.00%1.50%0.55%0.00%
FMIL
Fidelity New Millennium ETF
1.13%1.10%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%

Drawdowns

FGRO vs. FMIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRO drawdown since its inception was -44.52%, which is greater than FMIL's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRO and FMIL.


Loading graphics...

Volatility

FGRO vs. FMIL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF (FGRO) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) at 6.15%. This indicates that FGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FGROFMILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

6.15%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

10.28%

+4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.16%

18.69%

+6.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.40%

16.94%

+8.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.59%

17.78%

+7.81%