FGPMX vs. MIDSX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FGPMX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6) and MIDSX (Midas Fund) are both mutual funds - FGPMX is a Gold fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while MIDSX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Midas. Over the past 5 years, FGPMX returned 22.14%/yr vs 20.01%/yr for MIDSX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGPMX charges 0.54%/yr vs 4.25%/yr for MIDSX.

Performance

FGPMX vs. MIDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) and Midas Fund (MIDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGPMX achieves a -1.71% return, which is significantly lower than MIDSX's -0.86% return.

FGPMX

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -4.19%
• YTD: -1.71%
• 6M: -5.43%
• 1Y: 75.41%
• 3Y*: 52.91%
• 5Y*: 22.14%
• 10Y*: —

MIDSX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -5.21%
• YTD: -0.86%
• 6M: -5.72%
• 1Y: 63.21%
• 3Y*: 46.08%
• 5Y*: 20.01%
• 10Y*: 9.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGPMX vs. MIDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGPMX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6	-1.71%	197.33%	18.11%	2.35%	-23.15%	-3.66%	44.76%	52.07%	-17.76%	-10.66%
MIDSX Midas Fund	-0.86%	195.76%	7.27%	-1.79%	-11.11%	-19.23%	10.64%	30.56%	-12.90%	-1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FGPMX and MIDSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2017	0.92

The correlation between FGPMX and MIDSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGPMX vs. MIDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGPMX

FGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 35
FGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
FGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

MIDSX

MIDSX Risk / Return Rank: 25
MIDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
MIDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
MIDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MIDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MIDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGPMX vs. MIDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) and Midas Fund (MIDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGPMX	MIDSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.41	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	1.82	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.26	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	1.71	+0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.12	4.99	+1.13

FGPMX vs. MIDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGPMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the MIDSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGPMX and MIDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGPMX vs. MIDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGPMX drawdown since its inception was -48.71%, smaller than the maximum MIDSX drawdown of -89.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGPMX and MIDSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGPMX	MIDSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.71%	-89.77%	+41.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.73%	-37.99%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.73%	-37.99%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.71%	-43.33%	-5.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.98%	-42.94%	+15.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.93%	-63.48%	+45.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.58%	13.02%	-0.44%

Volatility

FGPMX vs. MIDSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) is 16.59%, while Midas Fund (MIDSX) has a volatility of 17.82%. This indicates that FGPMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGPMX	MIDSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.59%	17.82%	-1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.74%	39.39%	-1.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.22%	46.22%	-2.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.17%	35.04%	-0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.65%	33.61%	-0.96%

FGPMX vs. MIDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGPMX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than MIDSX's 4.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGPMX vs. MIDSX - Dividend Comparison

FGPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.84%, while MIDSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGPMX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6	9.84%	9.67%	12.41%	3.18%	0.00%	8.79%	10.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.82%
MIDSX Midas Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGPMX and MIDSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FGPMX and MIDSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FGPMX or MIDSX?

MIDSX has higher volatility (17.82%) compared to FGPMX (16.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGPMX dropped -48.71% vs MIDSX's -89.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.