FGPMX vs. FEGOX
FGPMX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6) and FEGOX (First Eagle Gold Fund Class C) are both Gold funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FGPMX returned 22.78%/yr vs 19.47%/yr for FEGOX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGPMX charges 0.54%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for FEGOX.
Performance
FGPMX vs. FEGOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGPMX achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly higher than FEGOX's -2.36% return.
FGPMX
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- -3.19%
- 1Y
- 79.21%
- 3Y*
- 51.45%
- 5Y*
- 22.78%
- 10Y*
- —
FEGOX
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- -2.36%
- 6M
- -5.79%
- 1Y
- 50.24%
- 3Y*
- 34.41%
- 5Y*
- 19.47%
- 10Y*
- 11.94%
FGPMX vs. FEGOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGPMX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 | -0.33% | 197.33% | 18.11% | 2.35% | -23.15% | -3.66% | 44.76% | 52.07% | -17.76% | -10.66% |
FEGOX First Eagle Gold Fund Class C | -2.36% | 126.68% | 9.47% | 6.26% | -2.33% | -8.41% | 28.65% | 37.47% | -16.58% | -3.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGPMX and FEGOX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FGPMX and FEGOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGPMX vs. FEGOX — Risk / Return Rank
FGPMX
FEGOX
FGPMX vs. FEGOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) and First Eagle Gold Fund Class C (FEGOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGPMX | FEGOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.23 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 1.50 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 4.14 | +1.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGPMX vs. FEGOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGPMX drawdown since its inception was -48.71%, smaller than the maximum FEGOX drawdown of -71.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGPMX and FEGOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGPMX | FEGOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.71% | -71.67% | +22.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.73% | -32.53% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.73% | -32.53% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.71% | -34.24% | -14.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.95% | -26.37% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.93% | -31.31% | +13.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.48% | 11.77% | +0.71% |
Volatility
FGPMX vs. FEGOX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) has a higher volatility of 16.62% compared to First Eagle Gold Fund Class C (FEGOX) at 13.55%. This indicates that FGPMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEGOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGPMX | FEGOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.62% | 13.55% | +3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.77% | 34.10% | +3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.20% | 39.76% | +4.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.15% | 29.11% | +5.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.65% | 27.39% | +5.26% |
FGPMX vs. FEGOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGPMX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than FEGOX's 1.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGPMX vs. FEGOX - Dividend Comparison
FGPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.70%, more than FEGOX's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEGOX First Eagle Gold Fund Class C | 0.71% | 0.70% | 5.05% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FGPMX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 | 9.70% | 9.67% | 12.41% | 3.18% | 0.00% | 8.79% | 10.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FGPMX and FEGOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FGPMX has higher volatility (16.62%) compared to FEGOX (13.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGPMX dropped -48.71% vs FEGOX's -71.67%.
FGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGPMX and FEGOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer