PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGPMX vs. FEURX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGPMX vs. FEURX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) and First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6 (FEURX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGPMX achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly higher than FEURX's -1.87% return.


FGPMX

1D
-2.42%
1M
-2.84%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
-3.19%
1Y
79.21%
3Y*
51.45%
5Y*
22.78%
10Y*

FEURX

1D
-2.15%
1M
-4.15%
YTD
-1.87%
6M
-5.30%
1Y
51.82%
3Y*
35.87%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGPMX vs. FEURX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGPMX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6
-0.33%197.33%18.11%2.35%-23.15%-3.66%44.76%52.07%-17.76%-10.66%
FEURX
First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6
-1.87%129.09%10.69%7.37%-1.26%-7.42%30.08%38.92%-15.55%-2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FGPMX and FEURX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2017

0.93

The correlation between FGPMX and FEURX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGPMX vs. FEURX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGPMX
FGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FEURX
FEURX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FEURX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEURX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEURX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FEURX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEURX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGPMX vs. FEURX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) and First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6 (FEURX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGPMXFEURXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

1.56

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.02

4.30

+1.72

FGPMX vs. FEURX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGPMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the FEURX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGPMX and FEURX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGPMX vs. FEURX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGPMX drawdown since its inception was -48.71%, which is greater than FEURX's maximum drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGPMX and FEURX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGPMXFEURXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.71%

-36.99%

-11.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.73%

-32.34%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.73%

-32.34%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.71%

-33.93%

-14.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.95%

-26.14%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.93%

-12.77%

-5.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.48%

11.69%

+0.79%

Volatility

FGPMX vs. FEURX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) has a higher volatility of 16.62% compared to First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6 (FEURX) at 13.56%. This indicates that FGPMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEURX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGPMXFEURXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.62%

13.56%

+3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.77%

34.11%

+3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.20%

39.77%

+4.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.15%

29.11%

+5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.65%

27.20%

+5.45%

FGPMX vs. FEURX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGPMX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than FEURX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGPMX vs. FEURX - Dividend Comparison

FGPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.70%, more than FEURX's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEURX
First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6
1.28%1.26%5.39%1.17%0.00%1.30%1.53%0.16%0.00%0.00%
FGPMX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6
9.70%9.67%12.41%3.18%0.00%8.79%10.04%0.00%0.00%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FGPMX and FEURX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGPMX has higher volatility (16.62%) compared to FEURX (13.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGPMX dropped -48.71% vs FEURX's -36.99%.

FGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGPMX and FEURX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer