FGILX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund (FGILX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
FGILX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 2012. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
FGILX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGILX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGILX Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund | -3.26% | 25.99% | 13.80% | 15.33% | -11.93% | 19.05% | 14.49% | 30.20% | -10.93% | 21.68% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGILX achieves a -3.26% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FGILX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 10.82%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
FGILX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- YTD
- -3.26%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 16.18%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGILX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGILX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGILX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
FGILX
FGIAX
FGILX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund (FGILX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGILX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 1.75 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 2.26 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.35 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 2.61 | -1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.71 | 12.12 | -5.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGILX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 1.75 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.80 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.58 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.42 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGILX and FGIAX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGILX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
FGILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGILX Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund | 2.13% | 2.06% | 2.38% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 11.94% | 3.17% | 1.51% | 6.23% | 2.10% | 1.27% | 2.75% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
FGILX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGILX drawdown since its inception was -30.59%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGILX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGILX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.59% | -49.35% | +18.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -8.29% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.40% | -21.08% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.59% | -38.02% | +7.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.66% | -3.78% | -4.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -7.22% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.78% | +0.46% |
Volatility
FGILX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund (FGILX) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that FGILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGILX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 4.05% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 7.09% | +1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.90% | 12.28% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.44% | 13.08% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 15.17% | -0.66% |