FGIAX vs. VMVFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX).
FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. VMVFX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Performance
FGIAX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGIAX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 2.85% | 12.74% | 13.38% | 7.82% | -4.48% | 23.74% | -3.99% | 23.28% | -1.79% | 15.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than VMVFX's 2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIAX has underperformed VMVFX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while VMVFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.14% annualized return.
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
VMVFX
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 4.18%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 11.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGIAX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGIAX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIAX
VMVFX
FGIAX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGIAX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 0.93 | +0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 1.34 | +0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.20 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 1.29 | +1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 6.16 | +5.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGIAX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 0.93 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.94 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.73 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.79 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIAX and VMVFX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGIAX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison
FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, less than VMVFX's 9.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 9.70% | 9.98% | 3.77% | 3.05% | 4.96% | 12.73% | 2.02% | 5.12% | 7.27% | 2.30% | 2.71% | 3.22% |
Drawdowns
FGIAX vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, which is greater than VMVFX's maximum drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and VMVFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIAX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -33.09% | -16.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -7.96% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -13.02% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.02% | -33.09% | -4.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -4.98% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -2.84% | -4.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.66% | +0.12% |
Volatility
FGIAX vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 2.93%. This indicates that FGIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGIAX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 2.93% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.09% | 4.99% | +2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 10.06% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 10.76% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 12.49% | +2.68% |