FGIAX vs. SVTAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SVTAX).
FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. SVTAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jul 26, 2006.
Performance
FGIAX vs. SVTAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGIAX vs. SVTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
SVTAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund | 1.52% | 13.44% | 12.77% | 7.77% | -7.80% | 18.18% | -2.68% | 19.81% | -6.47% | 17.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than SVTAX's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIAX has outperformed SVTAX with an annualized return of 8.78%, while SVTAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.24% annualized return.
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
SVTAX
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 8.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- 7.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGIAX vs. SVTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than SVTAX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGIAX vs. SVTAX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIAX
SVTAX
FGIAX vs. SVTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SVTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGIAX | SVTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 0.85 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 1.26 | +1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.18 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 1.14 | +1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.62 | 5.50 | +7.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGIAX | SVTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 0.85 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.74 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.59 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.49 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIAX and SVTAX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGIAX vs. SVTAX - Dividend Comparison
FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than SVTAX's 8.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
SVTAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund | 8.64% | 8.77% | 8.68% | 5.76% | 10.62% | 11.81% | 1.00% | 5.39% | 10.70% | 7.90% | 5.97% | 6.45% |
Drawdowns
FGIAX vs. SVTAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, which is greater than SVTAX's maximum drawdown of -43.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and SVTAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIAX | SVTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -43.81% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -8.34% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -16.52% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.02% | -31.02% | -7.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -4.56% | +1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -8.10% | +0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 1.73% | +0.06% |
Volatility
FGIAX vs. SVTAX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SVTAX) at 2.87%. This indicates that FGIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGIAX | SVTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 2.87% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.07% | 5.32% | +1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 10.79% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 10.65% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 12.28% | +2.89% |