FGIAX vs. PRAFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund (PRAFX).
FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. PRAFX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jul 27, 2010.
Performance
FGIAX vs. PRAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGIAX vs. PRAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
PRAFX T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund | 8.88% | 29.51% | 0.32% | 6.65% | -10.24% | 25.74% | 7.02% | 19.62% | -11.55% | 10.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than PRAFX's 8.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FGIAX having a 8.78% annualized return and PRAFX not far ahead at 8.97%.
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
PRAFX
- 1D
- 2.61%
- 1M
- -8.98%
- YTD
- 8.88%
- 6M
- 13.94%
- 1Y
- 32.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGIAX vs. PRAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAFX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGIAX vs. PRAFX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIAX
PRAFX
FGIAX vs. PRAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund (PRAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGIAX | PRAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 1.77 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 2.26 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.48 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.62 | 9.86 | +2.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGIAX | PRAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.77 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.52 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.50 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.35 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIAX and PRAFX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGIAX vs. PRAFX - Dividend Comparison
FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than PRAFX's 2.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
PRAFX T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund | 2.70% | 2.94% | 1.56% | 1.52% | 1.38% | 1.83% | 1.37% | 2.64% | 2.58% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 1.88% |
Drawdowns
FGIAX vs. PRAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, which is greater than PRAFX's maximum drawdown of -38.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and PRAFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIAX | PRAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -38.05% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -13.18% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -26.73% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.02% | -38.05% | +0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -8.98% | +5.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -8.82% | +1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 3.31% | -1.52% |
Volatility
FGIAX vs. PRAFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) is 4.15%, while T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund (PRAFX) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that FGIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGIAX | PRAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 6.99% | -2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.07% | 13.54% | -6.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 19.04% | -6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 17.69% | -4.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 18.14% | -2.97% |