FGIAX vs. NPSRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Fund (NPSRX).
FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. NPSRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Dec 18, 2006.
Performance
FGIAX vs. NPSRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGIAX vs. NPSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
NPSRX Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Fund | -1.08% | 11.19% | 9.12% | 6.19% | -9.50% | 5.43% | 5.53% | 17.68% | -5.65% | 11.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than NPSRX's -1.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIAX has outperformed NPSRX with an annualized return of 8.78%, while NPSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.31% annualized return.
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
NPSRX
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- -1.08%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 7.83%
- 3Y*
- 9.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGIAX vs. NPSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than NPSRX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGIAX vs. NPSRX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIAX
NPSRX
FGIAX vs. NPSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Fund (NPSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGIAX | NPSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 2.15 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 2.98 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.53 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.42 | +0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.62 | 9.75 | +2.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGIAX | NPSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.15 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.73 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.84 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.49 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIAX and NPSRX is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FGIAX vs. NPSRX - Dividend Comparison
FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than NPSRX's 5.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
NPSRX Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Fund | 5.92% | 5.72% | 5.38% | 5.87% | 6.18% | 4.97% | 5.02% | 5.39% | 6.00% | 5.51% | 5.81% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
FGIAX vs. NPSRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, smaller than the maximum NPSRX drawdown of -62.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and NPSRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIAX | NPSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -62.52% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -3.46% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -17.65% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.02% | -26.47% | -11.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -2.45% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -4.85% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 0.86% | +0.93% |
Volatility
FGIAX vs. NPSRX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Fund (NPSRX) at 1.59%. This indicates that FGIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NPSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGIAX | NPSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 1.59% | +2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.07% | 2.34% | +4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 3.71% | +8.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 4.97% | +8.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 6.32% | +8.85% |