FGIAX vs. NHMRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX).
FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. NHMRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Jun 6, 1999.
Performance
FGIAX vs. NHMRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGIAX vs. NHMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
NHMRX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 0.08% | 3.24% | 5.62% | 7.31% | -14.96% | 10.37% | 3.25% | 12.59% | 2.06% | 12.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than NHMRX's 0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIAX has outperformed NHMRX with an annualized return of 8.78%, while NHMRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.73% annualized return.
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
NHMRX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 2.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- 1.37%
- 10Y*
- 3.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGIAX vs. NHMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than NHMRX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGIAX vs. NHMRX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIAX
NHMRX
FGIAX vs. NHMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGIAX | NHMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 0.43 | +1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 0.61 | +1.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.12 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 0.60 | +2.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.62 | 1.44 | +11.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGIAX | NHMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 0.43 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.20 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.56 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.88 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIAX and NHMRX is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FGIAX vs. NHMRX - Dividend Comparison
FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than NHMRX's 6.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
NHMRX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 6.20% | 6.54% | 5.79% | 7.34% | 5.64% | 5.09% | 5.03% | 5.39% | 5.47% | 5.38% | 5.88% | 5.60% |
Drawdowns
FGIAX vs. NHMRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, which is greater than NHMRX's maximum drawdown of -45.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and NHMRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIAX | NHMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -45.45% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -7.92% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -21.52% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.02% | -22.22% | -15.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -2.42% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -5.35% | -1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 3.28% | -1.49% |
Volatility
FGIAX vs. NHMRX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX) at 1.87%. This indicates that FGIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NHMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGIAX | NHMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 1.87% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.07% | 2.75% | +4.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 8.04% | +4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 6.81% | +6.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 6.71% | +8.46% |