FGIAX vs. CSUIX
FGIAX (Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) and CSUIX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FGIAX returned 8.24%/yr vs 7.58%/yr for CSUIX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FGIAX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for CSUIX.
Performance
FGIAX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGIAX having a 11.78% return and CSUIX slightly higher at 12.30%. Over the past 10 years, FGIAX has outperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 8.24%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.58% annualized return.
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 15.52%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.95%
CSUIX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.63%
- 10Y*
- 7.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FGIAX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 11.78% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 12.30% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIAX and CSUIX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2007 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FGIAX and CSUIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGIAX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIAX
CSUIX
FGIAX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGIAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 3.08 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.18 | 9.77 | -1.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGIAX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and CSUIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -52.01% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.04% | -5.96% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.68% | -11.74% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -20.01% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.02% | -35.01% | -3.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | -1.98% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -8.11% | +0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.87% | +0.08% |
Volatility
FGIAX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 2.95%. This indicates that FGIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGIAX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 2.95% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.06% | 8.16% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.69% | 10.13% | +0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.24% | 12.97% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 14.87% | +0.29% |
FGIAX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGIAX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.27%, more than CSUIX's 7.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.93% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 14.27% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FGIAX and CSUIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FGIAX has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to CSUIX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGIAX dropped -49.35% vs CSUIX's -52.01%.
CSUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGIAX and CSUIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer