FGEAX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class A (FGEAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
FGEAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 17, 1998. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
FGEAX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGEAX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGEAX Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class A | -9.12% | 17.85% | 38.32% | 28.50% | -24.70% | 18.91% | 24.36% | 22.81% | -18.25% | 30.07% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGEAX achieves a -9.12% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FGEAX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 11.30%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
FGEAX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -10.00%
- YTD
- -9.12%
- 6M
- -6.48%
- 1Y
- 12.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGEAX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGEAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGEAX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
FGEAX
FGIAX
FGEAX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class A (FGEAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGEAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.75 | -1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.96 | 2.26 | -1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.35 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 2.61 | -1.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 12.12 | -9.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGEAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.75 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.80 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.58 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.42 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGEAX and FGIAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGEAX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
FGEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.64%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGEAX Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class A | 10.64% | 9.67% | 14.80% | 6.42% | 0.00% | 8.01% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 10.62% | 13.66% | 1.03% | 0.57% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
FGEAX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGEAX drawdown since its inception was -61.78%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGEAX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGEAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.78% | -49.35% | -12.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.03% | -8.29% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.93% | -21.08% | -11.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.04% | -38.02% | +4.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.03% | -3.78% | -9.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.35% | -7.22% | -6.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 1.78% | +1.65% |
Volatility
FGEAX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class A (FGEAX) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that FGEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGEAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 4.05% | +2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 7.09% | +5.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.01% | 12.28% | +7.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 13.08% | +5.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 15.17% | +3.26% |