FGDIX vs. MIDSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) and Midas Fund (MIDSX).
FGDIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 12, 2006. MIDSX is managed by Midas. It was launched on Jan 7, 1986.
Performance
FGDIX vs. MIDSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGDIX vs. MIDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDIX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I | 1.81% | 142.97% | 14.91% | -0.39% | -13.42% | -10.45% | 26.84% | 35.51% | -12.96% | 8.59% |
MIDSX Midas Fund | 3.72% | 195.76% | 7.27% | -1.79% | -11.11% | -19.23% | 10.64% | 30.56% | -12.90% | 5.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGDIX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than MIDSX's 3.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FGDIX has outperformed MIDSX with an annualized return of 14.04%, while MIDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.28% annualized return.
FGDIX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -25.43%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 84.61%
- 3Y*
- 36.42%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
MIDSX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -25.21%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 23.13%
- 1Y
- 115.48%
- 3Y*
- 44.09%
- 5Y*
- 22.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGDIX vs. MIDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGDIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than MIDSX's 4.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGDIX vs. MIDSX — Risk / Return Rank
FGDIX
MIDSX
FGDIX vs. MIDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) and Midas Fund (MIDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGDIX | MIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 2.65 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 2.73 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.42 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 3.91 | -1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.65 | 14.42 | -3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGDIX | MIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.65 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.68 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.40 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.01 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGDIX and MIDSX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGDIX vs. MIDSX - Dividend Comparison
FGDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, while MIDSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDIX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I | 2.06% | 2.10% | 3.58% | 0.97% | 0.36% | 1.59% | 4.40% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 3.65% |
MIDSX Midas Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FGDIX vs. MIDSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGDIX drawdown since its inception was -77.15%, smaller than the maximum MIDSX drawdown of -89.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDIX and MIDSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGDIX | MIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.15% | -89.77% | +12.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.85% | -30.18% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.95% | -48.48% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.57% | -57.07% | +6.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.43% | -40.30% | +14.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.98% | -63.68% | +23.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.95% | 8.19% | -0.24% |
Volatility
FGDIX vs. MIDSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) and Midas Fund (MIDSX) have volatilities of 15.39% and 15.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGDIX | MIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.39% | 15.85% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.03% | 36.12% | -1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.73% | 44.35% | -1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.76% | 33.89% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.05% | 33.34% | -0.29% |