FGD vs. SPGM
FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) and SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) are both Global Equities funds - FGD tracks the Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index while SPGM tracks the MSCI AC World IMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FGD returned 9.79%/yr vs 12.95%/yr for SPGM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPGM.
Performance
FGD vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than SPGM's 12.88% return. Over the past 10 years, FGD has underperformed SPGM with an annualized return of 9.79%, while SPGM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.95% annualized return.
FGD
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 33.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
SPGM
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- 1Y
- 31.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.95%
FGD vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 11.09% | 44.42% | 5.71% | 8.20% | -7.25% | 20.83% | -5.23% | 20.64% | -12.49% | 17.87% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 12.88% | 23.62% | 16.75% | 21.34% | -17.53% | 21.13% | 15.28% | 26.58% | -10.12% | 23.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGD and SPGM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2012 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FGD and SPGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
FGD vs. SPGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGD
SPGM
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
FGD
SPGM
Industrials
FGD
SPGM
Energy
FGD
SPGM
Communication Services
FGD
SPGM
Consumer Defensive
FGD
SPGM
Consumer Cyclical
FGD
SPGM
Basic Materials
FGD
SPGM
Utilities
FGD
SPGM
Real Estate
FGD
SPGM
Technology
FGD
SPGM
Healthcare
FGD
-
SPGM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGD vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank
FGD
SPGM
FGD vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGD | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.45 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.35 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.03 | 15.14 | -3.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGD | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.47 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.72 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.74 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.66 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
FGD vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than SPGM's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and SPGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGD | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -33.97% | -34.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -9.50% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.50% | -16.90% | +5.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -25.93% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.84% | -33.97% | -10.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | -0.87% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.57% | -4.81% | -7.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 2.10% | +0.68% |
Volatility
FGD vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) is 3.20%, while SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that FGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGD | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 3.92% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 10.35% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.56% | 12.88% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 16.03% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 17.57% | +0.66% |
FGD vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGD vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison
FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than SPGM's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 5.09% | 5.62% | 5.87% | 6.44% | 5.74% | 5.35% | 6.17% | 5.19% | 5.88% | 4.01% | 4.36% | 5.07% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 1.94% | 1.45% | 2.46% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGD and SPGM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPGM has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to FGD (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs SPGM's -33.97%.
On 10-year performance, SPGM leads with 12.95% vs 9.79% for FGD. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 12.95% return vs 9.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FGD.
FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 1.79% for SPGM.
FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while SPGM tracks MSCI AC World IMI. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGD and 0.09% for SPGM.
FGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGD and SPGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer