PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGD vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGD vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 22.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FGD has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 10.21%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 18.91% annualized return.


FGD

1D
-0.37%
1M
6.49%
6M
8.53%
YTD
17.14%
1Y
31.46%
3Y*
23.79%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
10.21%
ALL TIME*
6.23%

GRID

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.41%
6M
12.21%
YTD
22.54%
1Y
33.13%
3Y*
23.79%
5Y*
15.07%
10Y*
18.91%
ALL TIME*
12.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.40M$5.84M$6.62M
$110.01M$102.42M$133.91M

FGD vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
17.14%44.42%5.71%8.20%-7.25%20.83%-5.23%20.64%-12.49%17.87%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
22.54%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FGD and GRID is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.66

The correlation between FGD and GRID shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FGD vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGD
GRID

Financial Services

10.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Industrials

4.7%
23.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
2.4%

Communication Services

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

0.9%
0.8%

Energy

0.9%
1.6%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Technology

0.9%
12.6%

Utilities

0.9%
3.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Financial Services

FGD
10.4%
GRID

-

Consumer Defensive

FGD
4.7%
GRID

-

Industrials

FGD
4.7%
GRID
23.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FGD
3.8%
GRID
2.4%

Communication Services

FGD
1.9%
GRID

-

Basic Materials

FGD
0.9%
GRID
0.8%

Energy

FGD
0.9%
GRID
1.6%

Real Estate

FGD
0.9%
GRID

-

Technology

FGD
0.9%
GRID
12.6%

Utilities

FGD
0.9%
GRID
3.9%

Healthcare

FGD

-

GRID

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGD vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGD
FGD Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGD vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGDGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.26

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

2.10

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.89

7.41

+3.48

FGD vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGD Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGD and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGD vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.05%

-40.56%

-27.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-15.82%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.50%

-20.62%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-29.64%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.84%

-40.56%

-4.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-6.20%

+5.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.47%

-8.42%

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

4.48%

-1.58%

Volatility

FGD vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) is 2.16%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 8.70%. This indicates that FGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGDGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.16%

8.70%

-6.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

20.46%

-10.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.44%

23.19%

-10.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.86%

21.73%

-6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

22.83%

-4.92%

FGD vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGD vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than GRID's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
4.99%5.62%5.87%6.44%5.74%5.35%6.17%5.19%5.88%4.01%4.36%5.07%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.77%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGD and GRID have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (8.70%) compared to FGD (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 18.91% vs 10.21% for FGD. On fees, FGD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 2.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 18.91% return vs 10.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FGD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

FGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 0.77% for GRID.

FGD is categorized as Global Equities, while GRID is Infrastructure Equities. FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FGD and 0.70% for GRID.

FGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGD and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer