FGD vs. AMDY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while AMDY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. FGD is passively managed, while AMDY is actively managed. Over the past year, FGD returned 33.36% vs 240.44% for AMDY. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FGD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDY.

Performance

FGD vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 110.49% return.

FGD

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 11.09%
• 6M: 12.57%
• 1Y: 33.36%
• 3Y*: 22.45%
• 5Y*: 10.37%
• 10Y*: 9.79%

AMDY

• 1D: 3.39%
• 1M: 46.76%
• YTD: 110.49%
• 6M: 111.80%
• 1Y: 240.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGD vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund	11.09%	44.42%	5.71%	6.04%
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	110.49%	53.93%	-17.00%	26.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FGD and AMDY is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023	0.33

Return for Risk

FGD vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGD

FGD Risk / Return Rank: 74
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 65

AMDY

AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 93
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGD vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGD	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	4.53	-1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	4.54	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.64	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	8.77	-5.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.03	19.77	-7.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGD vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGD Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is lower than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 4.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGD and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGD	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67	4.53	-1.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	1.25	-0.99

Drawdowns

FGD vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than AMDY's maximum drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and AMDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGD	AMDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.05%	-53.92%	-14.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	-27.59%	+17.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.05%	0.00%	-2.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.57%	-18.02%	+5.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.78%	12.22%	-9.44%

Volatility

FGD vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) is 3.20%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 20.81%. This indicates that FGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGD	AMDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	20.81%	-17.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.73%	39.99%	-30.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.56%	53.40%	-40.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.92%	46.01%	-31.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.23%	46.01%	-27.78%

FGD vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGD vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, less than AMDY's 54.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	54.91%	80.68%	109.98%	6.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund	5.09%	5.62%	5.87%	6.44%	5.74%	5.35%	6.17%	5.19%	5.88%	4.01%	4.36%	5.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGD and AMDY in my portfolio?

FGD and AMDY have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGD or AMDY?

AMDY has higher volatility (20.81%) compared to FGD (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

Which ETF is better, FGD or AMDY?

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 240.44% vs 33.36% for FGD. On fees, FGD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FGD or AMDY?

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 240.44% return vs 33.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FGD or AMDY?

FGD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FGD or AMDY?

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 54.91%, compared with 5.09% for FGD.

What is the main difference between FGD and AMDY?

FGD is categorized as Global Equities, while AMDY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGD and 0.99% for AMDY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.53 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.