PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FFTY vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FFTY vs. VOT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

FFTY (CapForce IBD 50 ETF) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - FFTY tracks the IBD 50 Index while VOT tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FFTY returned 5.57%/yr vs 11.66%/yr for VOT. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FFTY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOT.

Performance

FFTY vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFTY having a 6.26% return and VOT slightly lower at 6.22%. Over the past 10 years, FFTY has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 5.57%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.66% annualized return.

FFTY

1D
-0.91%
1M
-9.03%
6M
3.47%
YTD
6.26%
1Y
13.28%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
-2.78%
10Y*
5.57%
ALL TIME*
4.04%

VOT

1D
0.21%
1M
-1.91%
6M
7.03%
YTD
6.22%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
12.46%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
11.66%
ALL TIME*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

FFTY

CapForce IBD 50 ETF
$863.41K$1.19M$1.59M

VOT

Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
$53.27M$59.32M$61.74M

FFTY vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTY
CapForce IBD 50 ETF		6.26%23.38%18.36%12.40%-51.08%11.92%18.20%25.74%-16.76%37.62%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF		6.22%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTY and VOT is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2015

0.82

The correlation between FFTY and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFTY vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FFTY
VOT

Healthcare

43.7%
8.0%

Financial Services

20.9%
6.0%

Technology

18.5%
33.8%

Industrials

5.7%
26.7%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%
10.8%

Energy

2.6%
1.8%

Utilities

2.1%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
0.7%

Communication Services

0.9%
3.0%

Real Estate

0.5%
4.2%

Healthcare

FFTY
43.7%
VOT
8.0%

Financial Services

FFTY
20.9%
VOT
6.0%

Technology

FFTY
18.5%
VOT
33.8%

Industrials

FFTY
5.7%
VOT
26.7%

Basic Materials

FFTY
3.6%
VOT
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FFTY
3.6%
VOT
10.8%

Energy

FFTY
2.6%
VOT
1.8%

Utilities

FFTY
2.1%
VOT
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

FFTY
1.0%
VOT
0.7%

Communication Services

FFTY
0.9%
VOT
3.0%

Real Estate

FFTY
0.5%
VOT
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CapForce IBD 50 ETF

Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF

Often compared with FFTY:
FFTY vs. SPYFFTY vs. QQQFFTY vs. BOUTFFTY vs. BFORFFTY vs. VOOFFTY vs. LOUPFFTY vs. IGV
Often compared with VOT:
VOT vs. VOVOT vs. VOEVOT vs. IWPVOT vs. VMGMXVOT vs. IJHVOT vs. IMCGVOT vs. FMDGX

Return for Risk

FFTY vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
FFTY
FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFTY vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FFTYVOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.26
0.13

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.59
0.30

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.03

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

0.14

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.00

0.40

+0.60

FFTY vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFTY and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFTY vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTY drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, roughly equal to the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTY and VOT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FFTYVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.46%

-60.16%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.29%

-15.96%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.60%

-21.77%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.46%

-37.19%

-22.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.46%

-37.19%

-22.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.10%

-3.52%

-21.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.32%

-9.90%

-12.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.51%

5.42%

+4.09%

Volatility

FFTY vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) at 4.19%. This indicates that FFTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FFTYVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.45%

4.19%

+4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.16%

13.89%

+15.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.53%

17.20%

+19.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.75%

21.56%

+8.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.79%

21.02%

+6.77%

FFTY vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFTY vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than VOT's 0.62% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFTY
CapForce IBD 50 ETF		1.27%1.35%0.91%0.65%2.75%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.00%0.00%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF		0.62%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

FFTY and VOT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFTY has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to VOT (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTY dropped -59.46% vs VOT's -60.16%.

On 10-year performance, VOT leads with 11.66% vs 5.57% for FFTY. On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOT has performed better with a 11.66% return vs 5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.62% for VOT.

FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: CapForce and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFTY and 0.05% for VOT.

FFTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFTY and VOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer