FFTY vs. PBUS
FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) and PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FFTY tracks the IBD 50 Index while PBUS tracks the MSCI USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FFTY returned -0.60%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for PBUS. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFTY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for PBUS.
Performance
FFTY vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFTY achieves a 20.11% return, which is significantly higher than PBUS's 10.82% return.
FFTY
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
PBUS
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
FFTY vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 20.11% | 23.38% | 18.36% | 12.40% | -51.08% | 11.92% | 18.20% | 25.74% | -16.76% | 5.88% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 10.82% | 17.58% | 24.99% | 27.33% | -19.64% | 26.77% | 21.75% | 31.60% | -4.77% | 7.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFTY and PBUS is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017 | 0.68 |
The correlation between FFTY and PBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
FFTY vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FFTY
PBUS
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
FFTY
PBUS
Technology
FFTY
PBUS
Basic Materials
FFTY
PBUS
Financial Services
FFTY
PBUS
Healthcare
FFTY
PBUS
Energy
FFTY
PBUS
Consumer Cyclical
FFTY
PBUS
Communication Services
FFTY
PBUS
Utilities
FFTY
PBUS
Consumer Defensive
FFTY
-
PBUS
Real Estate
FFTY
-
PBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFTY vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank
FFTY
PBUS
FFTY vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFTY | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.41 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 3.08 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 13.93 | -9.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFTY | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 2.30 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.80 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.80 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
FFTY vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFTY drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, which is greater than PBUS's maximum drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTY and PBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFTY | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.46% | -33.15% | -26.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.29% | -9.02% | -14.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.60% | -19.07% | -10.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.46% | -25.40% | -34.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.34% | -0.64% | -14.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.38% | -5.13% | -17.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.77% | 1.99% | +6.78% |
Volatility
FFTY vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison
Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a higher volatility of 9.42% compared to Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) at 2.94%. This indicates that FFTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFTY | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.42% | 2.94% | +6.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.18% | 9.13% | +17.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.09% | 12.06% | +22.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.14% | 17.05% | +12.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.41% | 19.33% | +8.08% |
FFTY vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFTY vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison
FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than PBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 1.12% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 0.98% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFTY and PBUS have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFTY has higher volatility (9.42%) compared to PBUS (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTY dropped -59.46% vs PBUS's -33.15%.
On 5-year performance, PBUS leads with 13.48% vs -0.60% for FFTY. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PBUS has performed better with a 13.48% return vs -0.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.
FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.98% for PBUS.
FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index, while PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFTY and 0.04% for PBUS.
PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFTY and PBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer