FFTY vs. JHMM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FFTY (CapForce IBD 50 ETF) and JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - FFTY tracks the IBD 50 Index while JHMM tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FFTY returned 5.57%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for JHMM. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FFTY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for JHMM.

Performance

FFTY vs. JHMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFTY achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly lower than JHMM's 13.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FFTY has underperformed JHMM with an annualized return of 5.57%, while JHMM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.70% annualized return.

FFTY

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -9.03%
• 6M: 3.47%
• YTD: 6.26%
• 1Y: 13.28%
• 3Y*: 13.48%
• 5Y*: -2.78%
• 10Y*: 5.57%
• ALL TIME*: 4.04%

JHMM

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -0.44%
• 6M: 8.72%
• YTD: 13.54%
• 1Y: 21.81%
• 3Y*: 14.22%
• 5Y*: 8.30%
• 10Y*: 11.70%
• ALL TIME*: 12.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF	$863.41K	$1.19M	$1.59M
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	$16.53M	$15.46M	$17.20M

FFTY vs. JHMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF	6.26%	23.38%	18.36%	12.40%	-51.08%	11.92%	18.20%	25.74%	-16.76%	37.62%
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	13.54%	10.73%	14.61%	14.53%	-15.30%	24.54%	16.22%	30.01%	-9.57%	19.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTY and JHMM is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2015	0.73

The correlation between FFTY and JHMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFTY vs. JHMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFTY	JHMM
Healthcare	43.7%	8.5%
Financial Services	20.9%	20.1%
Technology	18.5%	18.1%
Industrials	5.7%	16.4%
Basic Materials	3.6%	7.4%
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	8.3%
Energy	2.6%	1.8%
Utilities	2.1%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	6.1%
Communication Services	0.9%	1.0%
Real Estate	0.5%	8.1%

Return for Risk

FFTY vs. JHMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFTY

FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 18
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 18

JHMM

JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 64
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 57
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFTY vs. JHMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFTY	JHMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	1.41	-1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	2.06	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.25	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	2.34	-1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.00	8.99	-7.99

FFTY vs. JHMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the JHMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFTY and JHMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFTY vs. JHMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTY drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, which is greater than JHMM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTY and JHMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFTY	JHMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.46%	-40.71%	-18.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.29%	-8.64%	-14.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.60%	-21.88%	-7.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.46%	-24.10%	-35.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.46%	-40.71%	-18.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.10%	-1.20%	-23.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.32%	-5.37%	-16.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.51%	2.24%	+7.27%

Volatility

FFTY vs. JHMM - Volatility Comparison

CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) at 2.93%. This indicates that FFTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFTY	JHMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.45%	2.93%	+5.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.16%	10.62%	+18.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.53%	14.33%	+22.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.75%	18.30%	+11.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.79%	19.54%	+8.25%

FFTY vs. JHMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than JHMM's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFTY vs. JHMM - Dividend Comparison

FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than JHMM's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF	1.27%	1.35%	0.91%	0.65%	2.75%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	0.89%	0.98%	1.01%	1.17%	1.16%	0.72%	1.04%	1.02%	1.36%	0.90%	1.15%	0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFTY and JHMM in my portfolio?

FFTY and JHMM have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFTY or JHMM?

FFTY has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to JHMM (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTY dropped -59.46% vs JHMM's -40.71%.

Which ETF is better, FFTY or JHMM?

On 10-year performance, JHMM leads with 11.70% vs 5.57% for FFTY. On fees, JHMM is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFTY or JHMM?

Over the 10-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFTY or JHMM?

JHMM is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFTY or JHMM?

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.89% for JHMM.

What is the main difference between FFTY and JHMM?

FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index, while JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: CapForce and Manulife. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFTY and 0.42% for JHMM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.