FFSM vs. OPTZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FFSM (Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF) and OPTZ (Optimize Strategy Index ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. FFSM is actively managed, while OPTZ is passively managed. Over the past year, FFSM returned 35.51% vs 43.75% for OPTZ. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FFSM charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OPTZ.

Performance

FFSM vs. OPTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFSM achieves a 19.99% return, which is significantly lower than OPTZ's 24.46% return.

FFSM

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -1.26%
• 6M: 14.51%
• YTD: 19.99%
• 1Y: 35.51%
• 3Y*: 18.11%
• 5Y*: 10.60%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.02%

OPTZ

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -3.89%
• 6M: 20.35%
• YTD: 24.46%
• 1Y: 43.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 28.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	$10.97M	$10.32M	$6.89M
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF	$154.33K	$341.82K	$247.38K

FFSM vs. OPTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	19.99%	14.89%	9.91%
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF	24.46%	22.83%	16.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FFSM and OPTZ is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024	0.88

The correlation between FFSM and OPTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFSM vs. OPTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFSM	OPTZ
Industrials	21.9%	7.9%
Technology	19.9%	56.6%
Financial Services	13.9%	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	8.1%
Healthcare	9.8%	9.7%
Basic Materials	6.9%	1.0%
Real Estate	5.0%	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	3.6%
Energy	4.2%	1.2%
Utilities	2.3%	0.6%
Communication Services	0.6%	2.4%

Return for Risk

FFSM vs. OPTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFSM

FFSM Risk / Return Rank: 81
FFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 86

OPTZ

OPTZ Risk / Return Rank: 81
OPTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
OPTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
OPTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
OPTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
OPTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFSM vs. OPTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFSM	OPTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.88	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.56	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.32	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	3.09	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.18	12.07	+0.11

FFSM vs. OPTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the OPTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSM and OPTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFSM vs. OPTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSM drawdown since its inception was -26.65%, roughly equal to the maximum OPTZ drawdown of -25.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSM and OPTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFSM	OPTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.65%	-25.75%	-0.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.37%	-13.39%	+3.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.85%	-9.85%	+6.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.69%	-3.51%	-4.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	3.42%	-0.65%

Volatility

FFSM vs. OPTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) is 4.27%, while Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a volatility of 8.76%. This indicates that FFSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFSM	OPTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.27%	8.76%	-4.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.82%	18.77%	-3.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.90%	21.97%	-3.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.73%	21.88%	-1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.53%	21.88%	-1.35%

FFSM vs. OPTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSM has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than OPTZ's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFSM vs. OPTZ - Dividend Comparison

FFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than OPTZ's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	0.44%	0.56%	0.62%	0.56%	0.58%	0.37%
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF	0.47%	0.58%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFSM and OPTZ in my portfolio?

FFSM and OPTZ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFSM or OPTZ?

OPTZ has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to FFSM (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSM dropped -26.65% vs OPTZ's -25.75%.

Which ETF is better, FFSM or OPTZ?

On 1-year performance, OPTZ leads with 43.75% vs 35.51% for FFSM. On fees, OPTZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FFSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFSM or OPTZ?

Over the 1-year period, OPTZ has performed better with a 43.75% return vs 35.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFSM or OPTZ?

OPTZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FFSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFSM or OPTZ?

OPTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.44% for FFSM.

What is the main difference between FFSM and OPTZ?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Optimize. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FFSM and 0.25% for OPTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OPTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.