OPTZ vs. IJH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

OPTZ (Optimize Strategy Index ETF) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - OPTZ tracks the Optimize Strategy Index while IJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, OPTZ returned 43.75% vs 22.81% for IJH. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. OPTZ charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.

Performance

OPTZ vs. IJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPTZ achieves a 24.46% return, which is significantly higher than IJH's 14.60% return.

OPTZ

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -3.89%
• 6M: 20.35%
• YTD: 24.46%
• 1Y: 43.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 28.91%

IJH

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -1.08%
• 6M: 10.14%
• YTD: 14.60%
• 1Y: 22.81%
• 3Y*: 13.01%
• 5Y*: 8.44%
• 10Y*: 11.03%
• ALL TIME*: 9.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF	$461.96M	$459.67M	$538.23M
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF	$154.33K	$341.82K	$247.38K

OPTZ vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF	24.46%	22.83%	16.41%
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF	14.60%	7.42%	10.18%

Correlation

The correlation between OPTZ and IJH is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024	0.86

The correlation between OPTZ and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

OPTZ vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OPTZ	IJH
Technology	56.6%	17.5%
Healthcare	9.7%	8.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	10.5%
Industrials	7.9%	25.2%
Financial Services	7.8%	13.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	3.2%
Communication Services	2.4%	1.5%
Real Estate	1.3%	7.2%
Energy	1.2%	4.6%
Basic Materials	1.0%	4.8%
Utilities	0.6%	2.8%

Return for Risk

OPTZ vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OPTZ

OPTZ Risk / Return Rank: 81
OPTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
OPTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
OPTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
OPTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
OPTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 85

IJH

IJH Risk / Return Rank: 62
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OPTZ vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OPTZ	IJH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	1.34	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.00	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.24	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	2.39	+0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.07	8.69	+3.38

OPTZ vs. IJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPTZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the IJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPTZ and IJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OPTZ vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPTZ drawdown since its inception was -25.75%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPTZ and IJH.

Drawdown Indicators

	OPTZ	IJH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.75%	-55.07%	+29.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.39%	-8.83%	-4.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.10%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.10%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.85%	-2.39%	-7.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-7.53%	+4.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	2.42%	+1.00%

Volatility

OPTZ vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison

Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a higher volatility of 8.76% compared to iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) at 3.46%. This indicates that OPTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OPTZ	IJH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.76%	3.46%	+5.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.77%	11.63%	+7.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.97%	15.76%	+6.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.88%	19.67%	+2.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.88%	21.13%	+0.75%

OPTZ vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPTZ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

OPTZ vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison

OPTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than IJH's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF	1.18%	1.36%	1.33%	1.46%	1.68%	1.18%	1.28%	1.63%	1.72%	1.19%	1.60%	1.56%
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF	0.47%	0.58%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OPTZ and IJH in my portfolio?

OPTZ and IJH have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OPTZ or IJH?

OPTZ has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to IJH (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPTZ dropped -25.75% vs IJH's -55.07%.

Which ETF is better, OPTZ or IJH?

On 1-year performance, OPTZ leads with 43.75% vs 22.81% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OPTZ or IJH?

Over the 1-year period, OPTZ has performed better with a 43.75% return vs 22.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OPTZ or IJH?

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for OPTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OPTZ or IJH?

IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.47% for OPTZ.

What is the main difference between OPTZ and IJH?

OPTZ tracks Optimize Strategy Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Optimize and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for OPTZ and 0.05% for IJH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OPTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.