FFSM vs. EPU

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FFSM (Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF) and EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. FFSM is actively managed, while EPU is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FFSM returned 11.00%/yr vs 29.94%/yr for EPU. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFSM charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EPU.

Performance

FFSM vs. EPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FFSM having a 19.47% return and EPU slightly higher at 19.72%.

FFSM

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -1.40%
• 6M: 13.58%
• YTD: 19.47%
• 1Y: 32.97%
• 3Y*: 18.99%
• 5Y*: 11.00%
• 10Y*: —

EPU

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: -1.08%
• 6M: 7.53%
• YTD: 19.72%
• 1Y: 78.12%
• 3Y*: 43.35%
• 5Y*: 29.94%
• 10Y*: 13.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFSM vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	19.47%	14.89%	14.38%	17.30%	-16.35%	20.44%
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF	19.72%	86.87%	21.73%	25.34%	2.05%	-13.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FFSM and EPU is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021	0.51

The correlation between FFSM and EPU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFSM vs. EPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFSM	EPU
Industrials	25.7%	2.6%
Technology	18.5%	-
Financial Services	13.9%	27.9%
Healthcare	9.8%	0.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	3.0%
Energy	5.1%	-
Basic Materials	4.5%	54.2%
Real Estate	4.5%	3.0%
Utilities	2.3%	2.8%
Communication Services	0.6%	1.5%

Return for Risk

FFSM vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFSM

FFSM Risk / Return Rank: 72
FFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

EPU

EPU Risk / Return Rank: 83
EPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
EPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
EPU Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EPU Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFSM vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFSM	EPU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	2.49	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	2.91	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.39	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	3.77	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.54	10.39	+2.15

FFSM vs. EPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the EPU Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSM and EPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFSM vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSM drawdown since its inception was -26.65%, smaller than the maximum EPU drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSM and EPU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFSM	EPU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.65%	-60.62%	+33.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.37%	-20.85%	+10.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.78%	-20.85%	-3.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.65%	-35.59%	+8.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.27%	-7.70%	+3.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.73%	-18.76%	+11.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	7.54%	-4.90%

Volatility

FFSM vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) is 6.19%, while iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a volatility of 9.54%. This indicates that FFSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFSM	EPU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.19%	9.54%	-3.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.91%	27.25%	-12.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.89%	31.60%	-12.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.78%	25.20%	-4.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.59%	23.65%	-3.06%

FFSM vs. EPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSM has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than EPU's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFSM vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison

FFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than EPU's 2.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF	2.00%	1.63%	5.78%	4.17%	5.56%	3.13%	1.91%	2.67%	1.53%	3.30%	0.85%	1.90%
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	0.44%	0.56%	0.62%	0.56%	0.58%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFSM and EPU in my portfolio?

FFSM and EPU have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFSM or EPU?

EPU has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to FFSM (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSM dropped -26.65% vs EPU's -60.62%.

Which ETF is better, FFSM or EPU?

On 5-year performance, EPU leads with 29.94% vs 11.00% for FFSM. On fees, FFSM is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FFSM has been the lower-risk option at 6.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFSM or EPU?

Over the 5-year period, EPU has performed better with a 29.94% return vs 11.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFSM or EPU?

FFSM is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFSM or EPU?

EPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.44% for FFSM.

What is the main difference between FFSM and EPU?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FFSM and 0.59% for EPU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.