FFOG vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFOG (Franklin Focused Growth ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFOG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

FFOG vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFOG achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 79.03% return.

FFOG

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 5.98%
• YTD: 10.66%
• 6M: 9.70%
• 1Y: 23.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: -5.29%
• 1M: 25.28%
• YTD: 79.03%
• 6M: 68.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFOG vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FFOG Franklin Focused Growth ETF	10.66%	-2.68%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	79.03%	-36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FFOG and MEME is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.62

FFOG vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFOG	MEME
Technology	56.0%	58.8%
Consumer Cyclical	13.7%	-
Communication Services	13.5%	5.5%
Healthcare	5.7%	5.4%
Industrials	4.9%	29.9%
Financial Services	2.1%	5.7%
Utilities	1.4%	10.7%
Energy	0.7%	4.8%
Basic Materials	-	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

FFOG vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFOG

FFOG Risk / Return Rank: 29
FFOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FFOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FFOG Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FFOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
FFOG Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFOG vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFOG	MEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.25	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFOG	MEME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.32	0.28	+1.04

Drawdowns

FFOG vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFOG drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOG and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFOG	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.38%	-48.78%	+23.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-5.93%	+4.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.59%	-29.90%	+25.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.39%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FFOG	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.44%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.03%	74.19%	-54.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.79%	74.19%	-50.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.79%	74.19%	-50.40%

FFOG vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFOG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFOG vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

Neither FFOG nor MEME has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFOG and MEME in my portfolio?

FFOG and MEME have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FFOG or MEME?

On fees, FFOG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFOG or MEME?

FFOG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFOG or MEME?

FFOG and MEME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FFOG and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FFOG and 0.69% for MEME.