FFND vs. IUSG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFND (The Future Fund Active ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FFND is actively managed, while IUSG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FFND returned 21.85%/yr vs 27.59%/yr for IUSG. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFND charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.

Performance

FFND vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFND achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 14.08% return.

FFND

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 2.89%
• YTD: 6.70%
• 6M: 6.37%
• 1Y: 21.25%
• 3Y*: 21.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IUSG

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: 7.35%
• YTD: 14.08%
• 6M: 13.91%
• 1Y: 33.89%
• 3Y*: 27.59%
• 5Y*: 15.69%
• 10Y*: 17.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFND vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFND The Future Fund Active ETF	6.70%	19.38%	24.05%	40.05%	-39.84%	-4.81%
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	14.08%	21.23%	34.70%	29.28%	-28.81%	8.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FFND and IUSG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2021	0.87

The correlation between FFND and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFND vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFND	IUSG
Technology	26.1%	48.0%
Industrials	14.2%	7.5%
Financial Services	13.7%	8.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	9.3%
Healthcare	11.0%	6.2%
Communication Services	10.9%	17.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	1.0%
Utilities	2.0%	0.5%
Basic Materials	1.7%	0.5%
Energy	1.7%	0.2%
Real Estate	1.5%	0.9%

Return for Risk

FFND vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFND

FFND Risk / Return Rank: 47
FFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FFND Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FFND Martin Ratio Rank: 52

IUSG

IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 59
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 60
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFND vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFND	IUSG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.17	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.93	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.37	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	2.61	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.89	11.09	-2.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFND vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFND Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFND and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFND	IUSG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	2.17	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.38	-0.18

Drawdowns

FFND vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFND drawdown since its inception was -47.84%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFND and IUSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFND	IUSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.84%	-63.41%	+15.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.53%	-13.07%	+2.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.90%	-22.28%	+3.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.07%	-0.98%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.79%	-21.44%	+2.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	3.06%	-0.66%

Volatility

FFND vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) is 3.78%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that FFND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFND	IUSG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	4.23%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.20%	12.23%	-2.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.91%	15.72%	-2.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.04%	20.87%	+4.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.04%	20.40%	+4.64%

FFND vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFND has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFND vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

FFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than IUSG's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFND The Future Fund Active ETF	0.61%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	0.47%	0.53%	0.59%	1.12%	1.07%	0.59%	0.93%	1.64%	1.32%	1.28%	1.48%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFND and IUSG in my portfolio?

FFND and IUSG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFND or IUSG?

IUSG has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to FFND (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFND dropped -47.84% vs IUSG's -63.41%.

Which ETF is better, FFND or IUSG?

On 3-year performance, IUSG leads with 27.59% vs 21.85% for FFND. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FFND has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFND or IUSG?

Over the 3-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 27.59% return vs 21.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFND or IUSG?

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFND or IUSG?

FFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.47% for IUSG.

What is the main difference between FFND and IUSG?

They also come from different issuers: The Future Fund and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FFND and 0.04% for IUSG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.