FFND vs. BBUS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFND (The Future Fund Active ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FFND is actively managed, while BBUS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FFND returned 21.85%/yr vs 22.46%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFND charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.

Performance

FFND vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFND achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 10.60% return.

FFND

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 2.89%
• YTD: 6.70%
• 6M: 6.37%
• 1Y: 21.25%
• 3Y*: 21.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBUS

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 5.12%
• YTD: 10.60%
• 6M: 10.47%
• 1Y: 27.47%
• 3Y*: 22.46%
• 5Y*: 13.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFND vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFND The Future Fund Active ETF	6.70%	19.38%	24.05%	40.05%	-39.84%	-4.81%
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF	10.60%	17.77%	24.89%	27.20%	-19.46%	5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FFND and BBUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2021	0.88

The correlation between FFND and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFND vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFND	BBUS
Technology	26.1%	37.1%
Industrials	14.2%	7.2%
Financial Services	13.7%	10.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	9.4%
Healthcare	11.0%	8.1%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	4.5%
Utilities	2.0%	2.6%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.2%
Energy	1.7%	3.2%
Real Estate	1.5%	1.7%

Return for Risk

FFND vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFND

FFND Risk / Return Rank: 47
FFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FFND Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FFND Martin Ratio Rank: 52

BBUS

BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 68
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFND vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFND	BBUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.33	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	3.18	-0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.42	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	3.00	-0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.89	13.76	-4.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFND vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFND Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFND and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFND	BBUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	2.33	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.84	-0.63

Drawdowns

FFND vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFND drawdown since its inception was -47.84%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFND and BBUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFND	BBUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.84%	-35.35%	-12.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.53%	-9.21%	-1.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.90%	-19.01%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.07%	-0.74%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.79%	-5.46%	-13.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	2.00%	+0.40%

Volatility

FFND vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that FFND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFND	BBUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	2.88%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.20%	8.96%	+1.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.91%	11.87%	+1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.04%	17.03%	+8.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.04%	19.59%	+5.45%

FFND vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFND has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFND vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

FFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF	0.98%	1.07%	1.21%	1.38%	1.57%	1.11%	1.43%	1.37%
FFND The Future Fund Active ETF	0.61%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFND and BBUS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FFND and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFND or BBUS?

FFND has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFND dropped -47.84% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

Which ETF is better, FFND or BBUS?

On 3-year performance, BBUS leads with 22.46% vs 21.85% for FFND. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFND or BBUS?

Over the 3-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 22.46% return vs 21.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFND or BBUS?

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFND or BBUS?

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.61% for FFND.

What is the main difference between FFND and BBUS?

They also come from different issuers: The Future Fund and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FFND and 0.02% for BBUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.