FFLV vs. ONEQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ).
FFLV and ONEQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FFLV is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 22, 2024. ONEQ is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Composite Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2003.
Performance
FFLV vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFLV vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF | 2.88% | 16.04% | 8.04% |
ONEQ Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock | -5.66% | 20.89% | 21.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFLV achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ's -5.66% return.
FFLV
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 17.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONEQ
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -5.66%
- 6M
- -3.52%
- 1Y
- 26.29%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.29%
- 10Y*
- 17.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFLV vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFLV has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFLV vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank
FFLV
ONEQ
FFLV vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFLV | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 1.14 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.75 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 2.08 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.41 | 7.64 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFLV | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 1.14 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.61 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFLV and ONEQ is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FFLV vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison
FFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than ONEQ's 0.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF | 1.58% | 1.60% | 1.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEQ Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock | 0.82% | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 2.51% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.12% | 1.04% |
Drawdowns
FFLV vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFLV drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLV and ONEQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFLV | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.71% | -55.09% | +38.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -13.13% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.00% | -8.26% | +3.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -8.01% | +4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 3.57% | -0.88% |
Volatility
FFLV vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) is 4.15%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that FFLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFLV | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 7.03% | -2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.62% | 12.96% | -4.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 23.24% | -7.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 22.16% | -7.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 21.67% | -7.25% |