PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FFLV vs. CGDV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FFLVCGDV
Daily Std Dev13.56%11.45%
Max Drawdown-5.99%-21.82%
Current Drawdown0.00%-0.38%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between FFLV and CGDV is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FFLV vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.02%
12.94%
FFLV
CGDV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFLV vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLV has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.


FFLV
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
Expense ratio chart for FFLV: current value at 0.38% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.38%
Expense ratio chart for CGDV: current value at 0.33% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.33%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFLV vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFLV
Sharpe ratio
No data
CGDV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGDV, currently valued at 3.52, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.52
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGDV, currently valued at 4.86, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.86
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CGDV, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.65
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGDV, currently valued at 7.82, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.007.82
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CGDV, currently valued at 30.74, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0030.74

FFLV vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

FFLV vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

FFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than CGDV's 1.48% yield.


TTM20232022
FFLV
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
0.93%0.00%0.00%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.48%1.66%1.36%

Drawdowns

FFLV vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLV drawdown since its inception was -5.99%, smaller than the maximum CGDV drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLV and CGDV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-0.38%
FFLV
CGDV

Volatility

FFLV vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.29%. This indicates that FFLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.30%
3.29%
FFLV
CGDV