FFLG vs. SPIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FFLG (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFLG charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.

Performance

FFLG vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLG achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 27.30% return.

FFLG

• 1D: -2.46%
• 1M: -1.35%
• 6M: 8.61%
• YTD: 10.57%
• 1Y: 23.81%
• 3Y*: 23.89%
• 5Y*: 10.05%
• 10Y*: —

SPIT

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 18.89%
• YTD: 27.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLG vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF	10.57%	1.51%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	27.30%	5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLG and SPIT is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

FFLG vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLG

FFLG Risk / Return Rank: 41
FFLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FFLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FFLG Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FFLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FFLG Martin Ratio Rank: 46

SPIT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLG vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFLG	SPIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.13	—	—

Drawdowns

FFLG vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLG drawdown since its inception was -44.52%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLG and SPIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFLG	SPIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.52%	-12.49%	-32.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.94%	-5.43%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.07%	-2.51%	-11.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.89%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FFLG	SPIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.74%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.53%	26.39%	-5.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.68%	26.39%	-0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.50%	26.39%	-0.89%

FFLG vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLG has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFLG vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison

FFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than SPIT's 5.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF	0.13%	0.14%	0.09%	0.00%	1.50%	0.55%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	5.64%	7.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFLG and SPIT in my portfolio?

FFLG and SPIT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FFLG or SPIT?

On fees, FFLG is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFLG or SPIT?

FFLG is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFLG or SPIT?

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 0.13% for FFLG.

What is the main difference between FFLG and SPIT?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FFLG and 0.89% for SPIT.