FFLG vs. NFXS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FFLG (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF) and NFXS (Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - FFLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while NFXS is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FFLG returned 32.21% vs 64.26% for NFXS. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. FFLG charges 0.38%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for NFXS.

Performance

FFLG vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLG achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 24.21% return.

FFLG

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 11.85%
• 6M: 10.60%
• 1Y: 32.21%
• 3Y*: 26.87%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: —

NFXS

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 21.28%
• YTD: 24.21%
• 6M: 24.00%
• 1Y: 64.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLG vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF	11.85%	19.61%	6.12%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	24.21%	-8.56%	-21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLG and NFXS is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	-0.38

The correlation between FFLG and NFXS shifts across timeframes, from -0.38 (all time) to -0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FFLG vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLG

FFLG Risk / Return Rank: 48
FFLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
FFLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FFLG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FFLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
FFLG Martin Ratio Rank: 52

NFXS

NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 55
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLG vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFLG	NFXS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.91	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.55	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.36	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	2.06	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.62	5.64	+2.98

FFLG vs. NFXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLG Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the NFXS Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLG and NFXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFLG vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLG drawdown since its inception was -44.52%, smaller than the maximum NFXS drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLG and NFXS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFLG	NFXS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.52%	-50.37%	+5.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.23%	-31.31%	+17.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.84%	-12.88%	+8.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.16%	-31.93%	+17.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.75%	11.45%	-7.70%

Volatility

FFLG vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) at 7.74%. This indicates that FFLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFLG	NFXS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.52%	7.74%	+0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.85%	26.22%	-10.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.86%	33.81%	-13.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.56%	34.65%	-9.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.49%	34.65%	-9.16%

FFLG vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLG has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFLG vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison

FFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than NFXS's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF	0.13%	0.14%	0.09%	0.00%	1.50%	0.55%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	3.23%	3.53%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFLG and NFXS in my portfolio?

FFLG and NFXS have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFLG or NFXS?

FFLG has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to NFXS (7.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLG dropped -44.52% vs NFXS's -50.37%.

Which ETF is better, FFLG or NFXS?

On 1-year performance, NFXS leads with 64.26% vs 32.21% for FFLG. On fees, FFLG is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, NFXS has been the lower-risk option at 7.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFLG or NFXS?

Over the 1-year period, NFXS has performed better with a 64.26% return vs 32.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFLG or NFXS?

FFLG is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFLG or NFXS?

NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.13% for FFLG.

What is the main difference between FFLG and NFXS?

FFLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NFXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FFLG and 1.03% for NFXS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NFXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.