NFXS vs. ZIVB
NFXS (Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares) and ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFXS charges 1.03%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ZIVB.
Performance
NFXS vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NFXS
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 21.28%
- YTD
- 24.21%
- 6M
- 24.00%
- 1Y
- 64.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFXS vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares | 19.40% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 33.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFXS and ZIVB is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFXS vs. ZIVB — Risk / Return Rank
NFXS
ZIVB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NFXS vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFXS | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFXS vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFXS drawdown since its inception was -50.37%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFXS and ZIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFXS | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.37% | 0.00% | -50.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.88% | 0.00% | -12.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.93% | 0.00% | -31.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.45% | — | — |
Volatility
NFXS vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFXS | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.81% | 112.57% | -78.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.65% | 112.57% | -77.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.65% | 112.57% | -77.92% |
NFXS vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFXS has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFXS vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison
NFXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than ZIVB's 2.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares | 3.23% | 3.53% | 0.87% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 2.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFXS and ZIVB have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NFXS is cheaper at 1.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NFXS is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 2.37% for ZIVB.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for NFXS and 1.35% for ZIVB.
Find the right allocation for NFXS and ZIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer