FFLG vs. FBCG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFLG (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FFLG returned 12.59%/yr vs 15.84%/yr for FBCG. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FFLG charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.

Performance

FFLG vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLG achieves a 16.49% return, which is significantly higher than FBCG's 15.59% return.

FFLG

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 7.34%
• YTD: 16.49%
• 6M: 16.21%
• 1Y: 39.38%
• 3Y*: 28.99%
• 5Y*: 12.59%
• 10Y*: —

FBCG

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 7.84%
• YTD: 15.59%
• 6M: 15.51%
• 1Y: 39.38%
• 3Y*: 30.60%
• 5Y*: 15.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLG vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF	16.49%	19.61%	32.29%	49.71%	-37.86%	1.72%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	15.59%	18.60%	39.05%	57.98%	-39.10%	12.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLG and FBCG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021	0.98

The correlation between FFLG and FBCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFLG vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFLG	FBCG
Technology	51.7%	48.3%
Communication Services	15.1%	16.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	17.2%
Healthcare	6.4%	6.7%
Industrials	5.9%	5.7%
Financial Services	3.3%	2.2%
Utilities	1.4%	0.5%
Basic Materials	1.4%	0.6%
Real Estate	0.7%	0.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.6%	1.3%
Energy	0.3%	0.4%

Return for Risk

FFLG vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLG

FFLG Risk / Return Rank: 60
FFLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FFLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FFLG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FFLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FFLG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 57
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLG vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFLG	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.14	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	2.84	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.36	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	2.61	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.87	10.14	+0.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFLG vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLG and FBCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFLG	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	2.14	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.62	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.83	-0.40

Drawdowns

FFLG vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLG drawdown since its inception was -44.52%, roughly equal to the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLG and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFLG	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.52%	-43.56%	-0.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.23%	-15.17%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.72%	-27.89%	+1.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.52%	-43.56%	-0.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-1.05%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.27%	-11.49%	-2.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.63%	3.90%	-0.27%

Volatility

FFLG vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) have volatilities of 4.60% and 4.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFLG	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	4.79%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.11%	13.89%	+0.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.30%	18.55%	-0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.34%	25.79%	-0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.38%	25.72%	-0.34%

FFLG vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLG has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFLG vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

FFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF	0.13%	0.14%	0.09%	0.00%	1.50%	0.55%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFLG and FBCG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FFLG and FBCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFLG or FBCG?

FBCG has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to FFLG (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLG dropped -44.52% vs FBCG's -43.56%.

Which ETF is better, FFLG or FBCG?

On 5-year performance, FBCG leads with 15.84% vs 12.59% for FFLG. On fees, FFLG is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, FFLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFLG or FBCG?

Over the 5-year period, FBCG has performed better with a 15.84% return vs 12.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFLG or FBCG?

FFLG is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFLG or FBCG?

FFLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.

What is the main difference between FFLG and FBCG?

Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FFLG and 0.59% for FBCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.