FFLG vs. FBCG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG).
FFLG and FBCG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FFLG is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 2, 2021. FBCG is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 3, 2020.
Performance
FFLG vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFLG vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF | -7.11% | 19.61% | 32.29% | 49.71% | -37.86% | 1.72% |
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | -7.08% | 18.60% | 39.05% | 57.98% | -39.10% | 12.18% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FFLG having a -7.11% return and FBCG slightly higher at -7.08%.
FFLG
- 1D
- 4.82%
- 1M
- -5.34%
- YTD
- -7.11%
- 6M
- -5.65%
- 1Y
- 25.80%
- 3Y*
- 23.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- —
FBCG
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- -7.08%
- 6M
- -5.08%
- 1Y
- 26.17%
- 3Y*
- 26.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFLG vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFLG has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFLG vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank
FFLG
FBCG
FFLG vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFLG | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.00 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 1.57 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.22 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.82 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.42 | 6.44 | -0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFLG | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.00 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.44 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.68 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFLG and FBCG is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFLG vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison
FFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, more than FBCG's 0.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.16% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 1.50% | 0.55% | 0.00% |
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
FFLG vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFLG drawdown since its inception was -44.52%, roughly equal to the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLG and FBCG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFLG | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.52% | -43.56% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.23% | -15.17% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.52% | -43.56% | -0.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.09% | -9.60% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.71% | -11.78% | -2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 4.28% | -0.28% |
Volatility
FFLG vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) have volatilities of 8.50% and 8.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFLG | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 8.39% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.83% | 14.84% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.16% | 26.33% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 25.82% | -0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.59% | 25.92% | -0.33% |