PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFLC vs. PLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFLC vs. PLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLC achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than PLDR's 4.85% return.


FFLC

1D
-0.68%
1M
3.15%
YTD
10.26%
6M
11.18%
1Y
26.96%
3Y*
23.20%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*

PLDR

1D
-0.20%
1M
4.50%
YTD
4.85%
6M
4.09%
1Y
20.39%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLC vs. PLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
10.26%17.67%27.89%25.07%-0.04%2.47%
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
4.85%12.03%23.47%27.47%-22.52%11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLC and PLDR is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021

0.87

The correlation between FFLC and PLDR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFLC vs. PLDR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FFLC
PLDR

Technology

32.3%
24.1%

Communication Services

11.8%
12.0%

Financial Services

11.3%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
8.8%

Industrials

10.8%
8.3%

Healthcare

8.1%
4.9%

Energy

4.8%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
5.2%

Utilities

2.6%
2.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.9%

Technology

FFLC
32.3%
PLDR
24.1%

Communication Services

FFLC
11.8%
PLDR
12.0%

Financial Services

FFLC
11.3%
PLDR
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FFLC
10.9%
PLDR
8.8%

Industrials

FFLC
10.8%
PLDR
8.3%

Healthcare

FFLC
8.1%
PLDR
4.9%

Energy

FFLC
4.8%
PLDR
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

FFLC
4.1%
PLDR
5.2%

Utilities

FFLC
2.6%
PLDR
2.9%

Basic Materials

FFLC
1.8%
PLDR
2.4%

Real Estate

FFLC
1.1%
PLDR
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFLC vs. PLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLC
FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PLDR
PLDR Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLC vs. PLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFLCPLDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

1.60

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.30

6.04

+6.25

FFLC vs. PLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the PLDR Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLC and PLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFLCPLDRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.66

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.58

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.58

+0.59

Drawdowns

FFLC vs. PLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLC drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum PLDR drawdown of -29.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLC and PLDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFLCPLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-29.58%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.98%

-12.81%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-23.00%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-29.58%

+9.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.20%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-8.59%

+5.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

3.38%

-1.18%

Volatility

FFLC vs. PLDR - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) have volatilities of 3.15% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFLCPLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

3.19%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

9.56%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

12.38%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

17.07%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

17.04%

+0.61%

FFLC vs. PLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PLDR's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFLC vs. PLDR - Dividend Comparison

FFLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than PLDR's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
1.00%1.10%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
0.36%0.37%0.38%0.56%0.63%0.39%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FFLC and PLDR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PLDR has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to FFLC (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLC dropped -19.72% vs PLDR's -29.58%.

On 5-year performance, FFLC leads with 15.85% vs 9.82% for PLDR. On fees, FFLC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FFLC has performed better with a 15.85% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FFLC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PLDR.

FFLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.36% for PLDR.

FFLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PLDR is Sustainable. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Power Corporation of Canada. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FFLC and 0.59% for PLDR.

FFLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFLC and PLDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer