FFGX vs. FDCF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF).

FFGX and FDCF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FFGX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 19, 2024. FDCF is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 16, 2020.

Performance

FFGX vs. FDCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FFGX vs. FDCF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FFGX Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF	0.24%	27.85%	-2.87%
FDCF Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF	-10.46%	27.42%	-1.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly higher than FDCF's -10.46% return.

FFGX

• 1D: 3.99%
• 1M: -8.67%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 2.81%
• 1Y: 20.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDCF

• 1D: 4.40%
• 1M: -6.42%
• YTD: -10.46%
• 6M: -13.12%
• 1Y: 17.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGX vs. FDCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FDCF's 0.50% expense ratio.

FFGX

Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF

FDCF

Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF

Return for Risk

FFGX vs. FDCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGX

FFGX Risk / Return Rank: 60
FFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
FFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FDCF

FDCF Risk / Return Rank: 39
FDCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FDCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FDCF Omega Ratio Rank: 42
FDCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FDCF Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGX vs. FDCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFGX	FDCF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	0.74	+0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	1.16	+0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.16	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	0.90	+0.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.95	2.80	+3.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFGX vs. FDCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the FDCF Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGX and FDCF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFGX	FDCF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	0.74	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	1.02	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between FFGX and FDCF is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FFGX vs. FDCF - Dividend Comparison

FFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than FDCF's 0.04% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FFGX Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF	1.60%	1.62%	0.40%	0.00%
FDCF Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF	0.04%	0.09%	0.25%	0.19%

Drawdowns

FFGX vs. FDCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGX drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, smaller than the maximum FDCF drawdown of -22.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGX and FDCF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFGX	FDCF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.79%	-22.53%	+7.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.86%	-18.10%	+5.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.38%	-14.50%	+5.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-4.15%	+2.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	5.80%	-2.52%

Volatility

FFGX vs. FDCF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) has a higher volatility of 9.96% compared to Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) at 8.16%. This indicates that FFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFGX	FDCF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.96%	8.16%	+1.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.35%	14.44%	-1.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.30%	23.03%	-3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.32%	20.77%	-2.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.32%	20.77%	-2.45%