PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFGX vs. AVXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFGX vs. AVXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGX achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly lower than AVXC's 33.49% return.


FFGX

1D
-0.01%
1M
3.70%
YTD
14.05%
6M
16.18%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVXC

1D
-0.43%
1M
7.46%
YTD
33.49%
6M
37.64%
1Y
60.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGX vs. AVXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FFGX
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
14.05%27.85%-2.87%
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
33.49%31.45%-2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGX and AVXC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024

0.84

The correlation between FFGX and AVXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFGX vs. AVXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGX
FFGX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

AVXC
AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGX vs. AVXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFGXAVXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.54

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

4.32

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.52

17.45

-9.93

FFGX vs. AVXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the AVXC Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGX and AVXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFGXAVXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

3.02

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

1.56

-0.20

Drawdowns

FFGX vs. AVXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGX drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, smaller than the maximum AVXC drawdown of -20.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGX and AVXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFGXAVXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.79%

-20.44%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-14.04%

+1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-1.87%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-3.78%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.47%

-0.22%

Volatility

FFGX vs. AVXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) is 6.58%, while Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that FFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFGXAVXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

8.79%

-2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.61%

17.68%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.76%

20.08%

-2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.04%

18.45%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.04%

18.45%

+0.59%

FFGX vs. AVXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AVXC's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFGX vs. AVXC - Dividend Comparison

FFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than AVXC's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
1.50%1.97%1.34%
FFGX
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
1.40%1.62%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFGX and AVXC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVXC has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to FFGX (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGX dropped -14.79% vs AVXC's -20.44%.

On 1-year performance, AVXC leads with 60.29% vs 24.38% for FFGX. On fees, AVXC is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, FFGX has been the lower-risk option at 6.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVXC has performed better with a 60.29% return vs 24.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVXC is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FFGX.

AVXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 1.40% for FFGX.

FFGX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AVXC is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FFGX and 0.33% for AVXC.

AVXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFGX and AVXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer