PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVXC vs. AVES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVXC vs. AVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVXC achieves a 21.87% return, which is significantly higher than AVES's 7.59% return.


AVXC

1D
-0.32%
1M
-5.16%
6M
12.10%
YTD
21.87%
1Y
41.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.45%

AVES

1D
-0.75%
1M
-4.02%
6M
0.78%
YTD
7.59%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.66M$7.29M$6.23M
$2.17M$2.40M$3.36M

AVXC vs. AVES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
21.87%31.45%-1.26%
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
7.59%30.49%0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AVXC and AVES is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024

0.86

The correlation between AVXC and AVES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVXC vs. AVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVXC
AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

AVES
AVES Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVES Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVES Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVXC vs. AVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVXCAVESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.18

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.44

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

4.35

+4.22

AVXC vs. AVES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVXC Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the AVES Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVXC and AVES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVXC vs. AVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVXC drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, smaller than the maximum AVES drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVXC and AVES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVXCAVESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.44%

-27.40%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.43%

-12.90%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.59%

-9.48%

-3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-7.66%

+3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

4.26%

+0.49%

Volatility

AVXC vs. AVES - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) has a higher volatility of 9.85% compared to Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) at 6.96%. This indicates that AVXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVXCAVESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.85%

6.96%

+2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.43%

18.01%

+5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.10%

20.01%

+5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.62%

17.49%

+3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

17.49%

+3.13%

AVXC vs. AVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVXC has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than AVES's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVXC vs. AVES - Dividend Comparison

AVXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than AVES's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.59%3.17%4.09%3.96%3.70%0.62%
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
1.73%1.97%1.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVXC and AVES have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVXC has higher volatility (9.85%) compared to AVES (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVXC dropped -20.44% vs AVES's -27.40%.

On 1-year performance, AVXC leads with 41.12% vs 19.41% for AVES. On fees, AVXC is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, AVES has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVXC has performed better with a 41.12% return vs 19.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVXC is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVES.

AVES has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.73% for AVXC.

Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVXC and 0.36% for AVES.

AVXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVXC and AVES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer