PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVXC vs. DAADX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVXC vs. DAADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AVXC having a 39.43% return and DAADX slightly higher at 40.41%.


AVXC

1D
0.29%
1M
10.05%
YTD
39.43%
6M
41.85%
1Y
66.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DAADX

1D
3.39%
1M
8.84%
YTD
40.41%
6M
43.30%
1Y
65.20%
3Y*
26.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVXC vs. DAADX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVXC and DAADX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024

0.90

The correlation between AVXC and DAADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVXC vs. DAADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVXC
AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

DAADX
DAADX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DAADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAADX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DAADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAADX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVXC vs. DAADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVXCDAADXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.64

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

4.96

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.46

18.83

-0.36

AVXC vs. DAADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVXC Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the DAADX Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVXC and DAADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVXC vs. DAADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVXC drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, smaller than the maximum DAADX drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVXC and DAADX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVXCDAADXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.44%

-24.98%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-13.14%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-6.71%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

3.44%

+0.17%

Volatility

AVXC vs. DAADX - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) has a higher volatility of 11.54% compared to DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX) at 10.89%. This indicates that AVXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVXCDAADXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.54%

10.89%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.26%

18.26%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.31%

19.90%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.47%

15.19%

+4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.47%

15.19%

+4.28%

AVXC vs. DAADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVXC has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than DAADX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVXC vs. DAADX - Dividend Comparison

AVXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than DAADX's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
1.94%1.97%1.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DAADX
DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio
1.78%2.28%2.64%2.82%3.02%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVXC and DAADX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVXC has higher volatility (11.54%) compared to DAADX (10.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVXC dropped -20.44% vs DAADX's -24.98%.

DAADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 3.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVXC and DAADX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer