PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFF vs. OUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFF vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Founders 100 ETF (FFF) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFF achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly lower than OUSA's 6.53% return.


FFF

1D
0.58%
1M
-2.83%
6M
3.03%
YTD
-3.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

OUSA

1D
0.11%
1M
1.87%
6M
4.63%
YTD
6.53%
1Y
15.60%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
10.36%
ALL TIME*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$61.65K$77.62K$91.68K
$914.72K$1.31M$1.45M

FFF vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FFF
Founders 100 ETF
-3.41%-1.66%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
6.53%0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FFF and OUSA is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFF vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFF vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founders 100 ETF (FFF) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFFOUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

FFF vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFF vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFF drawdown since its inception was -21.89%, smaller than the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFF and OUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFOUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.89%

-33.12%

+11.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.45%

-0.75%

-9.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.75%

-3.50%

-6.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

Volatility

FFF vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFOUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.58%

10.27%

+16.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.58%

13.38%

+13.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.58%

15.19%

+11.39%

FFF vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFF vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

FFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFF
Founders 100 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.36%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFF and OUSA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FFF.

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.00% for FFF.

FFF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OUSA is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Founder ETFs and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FFF and 0.48% for OUSA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFF and OUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer