PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFEM vs. EEMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FFEM vs. EEMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FFEM vs. EEMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FFEM
Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF
6.88%40.03%-2.27%
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
3.38%19.78%-0.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFEM achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly higher than EEMS's 3.38% return.


FFEM

1D
0.79%
1M
-6.99%
YTD
6.88%
6M
12.73%
1Y
42.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EEMS

1D
0.84%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
3.38%
6M
4.76%
1Y
27.44%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
8.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFEM vs. EEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMS's 0.73% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FFEM vs. EEMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFEM
FFEM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMS
EEMS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFEM vs. EEMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFEMEEMSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

1.56

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

2.09

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.68

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.03

9.64

+2.39

FFEM vs. EEMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the EEMS Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFEM and EEMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFEMEEMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

1.56

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.56

0.28

+1.27

Correlation

The correlation between FFEM and EEMS is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FFEM vs. EEMS - Dividend Comparison

FFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than EEMS's 2.99% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFEM
Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF
1.52%1.59%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
2.99%3.09%2.60%2.69%0.89%3.56%2.14%2.64%3.06%2.47%2.51%2.33%

Drawdowns

FFEM vs. EEMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFEM drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, smaller than the maximum EEMS drawdown of -48.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEM and EEMS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FFEMEEMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.29%

-48.89%

+32.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-10.99%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.03%

-7.86%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-10.60%

+8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

3.06%

+0.52%

Volatility

FFEM vs. EEMS - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) at 8.24%. This indicates that FFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FFEMEEMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.69%

8.24%

+2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.76%

12.39%

+4.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.16%

17.74%

+4.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.11%

15.69%

+5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

17.79%

+3.32%