FFEM vs. EEMS
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS).
FFEM and EEMS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FFEM is managed by Fidelity. EEMS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index. It was launched on Aug 16, 2011.
Performance
FFEM vs. EEMS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFEM vs. EEMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 6.88% | 40.03% | -2.27% |
EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF | 3.38% | 19.78% | -0.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFEM achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly higher than EEMS's 3.38% return.
FFEM
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- 6.88%
- 6M
- 12.73%
- 1Y
- 42.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EEMS
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- 3.38%
- 6M
- 4.76%
- 1Y
- 27.44%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFEM vs. EEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMS's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFEM vs. EEMS — Risk / Return Rank
FFEM
EEMS
FFEM vs. EEMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFEM | EEMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 1.56 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 2.09 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.30 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 2.68 | +0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.03 | 9.64 | +2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFEM | EEMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.56 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.56 | 0.28 | +1.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFEM and EEMS is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFEM vs. EEMS - Dividend Comparison
FFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than EEMS's 2.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 1.52% | 1.59% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF | 2.99% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.69% | 0.89% | 3.56% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 3.06% | 2.47% | 2.51% | 2.33% |
Drawdowns
FFEM vs. EEMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFEM drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, smaller than the maximum EEMS drawdown of -48.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEM and EEMS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFEM | EEMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.29% | -48.89% | +32.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -10.99% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -7.86% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | -10.60% | +8.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 3.06% | +0.52% |
Volatility
FFEM vs. EEMS - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) at 8.24%. This indicates that FFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFEM | EEMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 8.24% | +2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 12.39% | +4.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 17.74% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 15.69% | +5.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 17.79% | +3.32% |