PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFEM vs. GQJPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFEM vs. GQJPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQJPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFEM achieves a 35.17% return, which is significantly higher than GQJPX's 6.04% return.


FFEM

1D
1.46%
1M
11.57%
YTD
35.17%
6M
39.07%
1Y
71.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GQJPX

1D
-0.48%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
6.04%
6M
7.49%
1Y
15.01%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFEM vs. GQJPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FFEM and GQJPX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024

0.51

The correlation between FFEM and GQJPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFEM vs. GQJPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFEM
FFEM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

GQJPX
GQJPX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GQJPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQJPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQJPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GQJPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQJPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFEM vs. GQJPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQJPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFEMGQJPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.35

1.55

+1.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.15

2.16

+1.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.28

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.37

1.86

+3.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.40

5.97

+15.43

FFEM vs. GQJPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFEM Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the GQJPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFEM and GQJPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFEMGQJPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

1.55

+1.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.29

0.69

+1.60

Drawdowns

FFEM vs. GQJPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFEM drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, smaller than the maximum GQJPX drawdown of -21.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEM and GQJPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFEMGQJPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.29%

-21.83%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-8.56%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.34%

+5.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-5.52%

+3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

2.67%

+0.73%

Volatility

FFEM vs. GQJPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQJPX) at 2.72%. This indicates that FFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQJPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFEMGQJPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.79%

2.72%

+6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.69%

8.34%

+10.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.50%

10.24%

+11.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.00%

12.96%

+9.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.00%

12.96%

+9.04%

FFEM vs. GQJPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GQJPX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFEM vs. GQJPX - Dividend Comparison

FFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than GQJPX's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FFEM
Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF
1.21%1.59%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GQJPX
GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund
3.92%3.22%3.35%4.50%5.59%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFEM and GQJPX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFEM has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to GQJPX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFEM dropped -16.29% vs GQJPX's -21.83%.

FFEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFEM and GQJPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer