FFEM vs. GQJPX
FFEM (Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF) and GQJPX (GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund) are both funds - FFEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Fidelity, while GQJPX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by GQG Partners Inc. Over the past year, FFEM returned 71.52% vs 15.01% for GQJPX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFEM charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for GQJPX.
Performance
FFEM vs. GQJPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFEM achieves a 35.17% return, which is significantly higher than GQJPX's 6.04% return.
FFEM
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 11.57%
- YTD
- 35.17%
- 6M
- 39.07%
- 1Y
- 71.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GQJPX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 7.49%
- 1Y
- 15.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFEM vs. GQJPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 35.17% | 40.03% | -2.27% |
GQJPX GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund | 6.04% | 24.88% | -2.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFEM and GQJPX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.51 |
The correlation between FFEM and GQJPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFEM vs. GQJPX — Risk / Return Rank
FFEM
GQJPX
FFEM vs. GQJPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQJPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFEM | GQJPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.35 | 1.55 | +1.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.15 | 2.16 | +1.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.28 | +0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.37 | 1.86 | +3.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.40 | 5.97 | +15.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFEM | GQJPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35 | 1.55 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.29 | 0.69 | +1.60 |
Drawdowns
FFEM vs. GQJPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFEM drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, smaller than the maximum GQJPX drawdown of -21.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEM and GQJPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFEM | GQJPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.29% | -21.83% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -8.56% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.34% | +5.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -5.52% | +3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 2.67% | +0.73% |
Volatility
FFEM vs. GQJPX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQJPX) at 2.72%. This indicates that FFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQJPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFEM | GQJPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.79% | 2.72% | +6.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.69% | 8.34% | +10.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.50% | 10.24% | +11.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.00% | 12.96% | +9.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.00% | 12.96% | +9.04% |
FFEM vs. GQJPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GQJPX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFEM vs. GQJPX - Dividend Comparison
FFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than GQJPX's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 1.21% | 1.59% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GQJPX GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund | 3.92% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 4.50% | 5.59% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFEM and GQJPX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFEM has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to GQJPX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFEM dropped -16.29% vs GQJPX's -21.83%.
FFEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFEM and GQJPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer