FFAAX vs. WMRIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FFAAX (Franklin Global Allocation Fund) and WMRIX (Wilmington Real Asset Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, FFAAX returned 7.87%/yr vs 5.47%/yr for WMRIX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFAAX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for WMRIX.

Performance

FFAAX vs. WMRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Global Allocation Fund (FFAAX) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFAAX achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly lower than WMRIX's 11.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FFAAX has outperformed WMRIX with an annualized return of 7.87%, while WMRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.47% annualized return.

FFAAX

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 1.36%
• YTD: 8.35%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 20.26%
• 3Y*: 14.50%
• 5Y*: 8.70%
• 10Y*: 7.87%

WMRIX

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -4.50%
• YTD: 11.89%
• 6M: 12.19%
• 1Y: 16.83%
• 3Y*: 9.91%
• 5Y*: 5.46%
• 10Y*: 5.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFAAX vs. WMRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFAAX Franklin Global Allocation Fund	8.35%	16.24%	13.12%	13.24%	-11.61%	12.01%	1.70%	18.06%	-9.60%	11.59%
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund	11.89%	12.79%	2.57%	1.12%	-8.03%	21.49%	-2.19%	16.85%	-7.21%	11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FFAAX and WMRIX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2003	0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between FFAAX and WMRIX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FFAAX vs. WMRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFAAX

FFAAX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FFAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FFAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FFAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FFAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FFAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

WMRIX

WMRIX Risk / Return Rank: 47
WMRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
WMRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
WMRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
WMRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
WMRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFAAX vs. WMRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Allocation Fund (FFAAX) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFAAX	WMRIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	1.85	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	2.50	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.33	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	2.61	+0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.35	10.58	+2.77

FFAAX vs. WMRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the WMRIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFAAX and WMRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFAAX vs. WMRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFAAX drawdown since its inception was -52.89%, which is greater than WMRIX's maximum drawdown of -37.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFAAX and WMRIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFAAX	WMRIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.89%	-37.84%	-15.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.64%	-6.32%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.89%	-10.95%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.17%	-22.03%	+3.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.09%	-31.27%	+1.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-6.32%	+6.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.11%	-7.17%	+0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.50%	1.58%	-0.08%

Volatility

FFAAX vs. WMRIX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Global Allocation Fund (FFAAX) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) at 1.86%. This indicates that FFAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFAAX	WMRIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	1.86%	+1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.71%	6.78%	+0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.10%	8.91%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.13%	11.48%	-1.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.50%	12.51%	-1.01%

FFAAX vs. WMRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFAAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than WMRIX's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFAAX vs. WMRIX - Dividend Comparison

FFAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than WMRIX's 6.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFAAX Franklin Global Allocation Fund	4.95%	5.12%	1.33%	1.88%	4.66%	0.90%	7.65%	3.24%	4.24%	3.19%	2.40%	3.22%
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund	6.37%	7.15%	1.02%	3.51%	6.07%	9.29%	1.99%	3.03%	2.84%	2.73%	0.00%	5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFAAX and WMRIX in my portfolio?

FFAAX and WMRIX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFAAX or WMRIX?

FFAAX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to WMRIX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFAAX dropped -52.89% vs WMRIX's -37.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.