FFAAX vs. RAPZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Global Allocation Fund (FFAAX) and Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX).
FFAAX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Aug 14, 2003. RAPZX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Jan 30, 2012.
Performance
FFAAX vs. RAPZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFAAX vs. RAPZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFAAX Franklin Global Allocation Fund | -3.10% | 16.24% | 13.12% | 13.24% | -11.61% | 12.01% | 1.70% | 18.06% | -9.60% | 11.59% |
RAPZX Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc | 10.26% | 11.96% | 4.35% | 3.88% | -2.05% | 23.51% | -0.84% | 17.77% | -8.44% | 6.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFAAX achieves a -3.10% return, which is significantly lower than RAPZX's 10.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FFAAX having a 7.00% annualized return and RAPZX not far ahead at 7.09%.
FFAAX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -6.23%
- YTD
- -3.10%
- 6M
- -0.69%
- 1Y
- 12.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.00%
RAPZX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 16.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- 8.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFAAX vs. RAPZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFAAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than RAPZX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFAAX vs. RAPZX — Risk / Return Rank
FFAAX
RAPZX
FFAAX vs. RAPZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Allocation Fund (FFAAX) and Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFAAX | RAPZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.41 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 1.77 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.30 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.94 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.91 | 8.99 | -2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFAAX | RAPZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.41 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.68 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.56 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.34 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFAAX and RAPZX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FFAAX vs. RAPZX - Dividend Comparison
FFAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than RAPZX's 1.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFAAX Franklin Global Allocation Fund | 5.28% | 5.12% | 1.33% | 1.88% | 4.66% | 0.90% | 7.65% | 3.24% | 4.24% | 3.19% | 2.40% | 3.22% |
RAPZX Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc | 1.31% | 1.44% | 3.20% | 2.71% | 3.08% | 9.61% | 1.71% | 2.85% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 2.83% | 2.00% |
Drawdowns
FFAAX vs. RAPZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFAAX drawdown since its inception was -52.89%, which is greater than RAPZX's maximum drawdown of -30.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFAAX and RAPZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFAAX | RAPZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.89% | -30.69% | -22.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.75% | -8.84% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.17% | -19.31% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.09% | -30.69% | +0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.64% | -2.88% | -3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -8.16% | +0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 1.90% | -0.24% |
Volatility
FFAAX vs. RAPZX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Global Allocation Fund (FFAAX) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) at 2.90%. This indicates that FFAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAPZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFAAX | RAPZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 2.90% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.44% | 9.10% | -2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 12.24% | -1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.94% | 12.86% | -2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.47% | 12.81% | -1.34% |