PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEZ vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEZ vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 23.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 11.53%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.37% annualized return.


FEZ

1D
-1.75%
1M
1.84%
YTD
6.43%
6M
6.45%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
11.53%

XLE

1D
0.74%
1M
-7.80%
YTD
23.49%
6M
24.07%
1Y
30.55%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEZ vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
6.43%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
23.49%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FEZ and XLE is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2002

0.52

The correlation between FEZ and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FEZ vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEZ
XLE

Financial Services

23.8%

-

Technology

19.6%

-

Industrials

19.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.9%

-

Healthcare

5.6%

-

Energy

5.3%
100.0%

Utilities

5.0%

-

Basic Materials

3.8%

-

Communication Services

2.6%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

FEZ
23.8%
XLE

-

Technology

FEZ
19.6%
XLE

-

Industrials

FEZ
19.3%
XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

FEZ
9.3%
XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

FEZ
5.9%
XLE

-

Healthcare

FEZ
5.6%
XLE

-

Energy

FEZ
5.3%
XLE
100.0%

Utilities

FEZ
5.0%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

FEZ
3.8%
XLE

-

Communication Services

FEZ
2.6%
XLE

-

Real Estate

FEZ

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEZ vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEZ vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEZXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.25

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

2.18

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.82

6.53

-1.71

FEZ vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEZ and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEZ vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEZXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.21%

-71.26%

+7.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-14.05%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.85%

-20.14%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-26.04%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-66.81%

+27.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-12.32%

+9.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.04%

-17.96%

+0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

4.69%

-0.70%

Volatility

FEZ vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) is 5.85%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that FEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEZXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

7.12%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.57%

16.82%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.40%

20.93%

-2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.70%

25.98%

-5.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

29.60%

-8.85%

FEZ vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEZ vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than XLE's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.64%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.79%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEZ and XLE have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to FEZ (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, FEZ leads with 11.53% vs 9.37% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FEZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 11.53% return vs 9.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 2.64% for FEZ.

FEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEZ and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer