FEZ vs. SMH
FEZ (State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEZ returned 11.13%/yr vs 38.18%/yr for SMH. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEZ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
FEZ vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 79.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 11.13%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 38.18% annualized return.
FEZ
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- 1Y
- 21.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
SMH
- 1D
- 4.38%
- 1M
- 16.31%
- YTD
- 79.69%
- 6M
- 83.94%
- 1Y
- 152.58%
- 3Y*
- 62.32%
- 5Y*
- 39.72%
- 10Y*
- 38.18%
FEZ vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 8.27% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 79.69% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEZ and SMH is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2002 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FEZ and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEZ vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEZ
SMH
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
FEZ
SMH
-
Industrials
FEZ
SMH
-
Technology
FEZ
SMH
Consumer Cyclical
FEZ
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
FEZ
SMH
-
Healthcare
FEZ
SMH
-
Energy
FEZ
SMH
-
Utilities
FEZ
SMH
-
Basic Materials
FEZ
SMH
-
Communication Services
FEZ
SMH
-
Real Estate
FEZ
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEZ vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
FEZ
SMH
FEZ vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEZ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.65 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 10.28 | -8.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | 37.77 | -32.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEZ vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEZ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -84.96% | +20.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.63% | -14.93% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.85% | -35.74% | +19.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -45.30% | +10.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | -45.30% | +5.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.05% | -41.04% | +23.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 4.06% | -0.06% |
Volatility
FEZ vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) is 6.60%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.71%. This indicates that FEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEZ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 16.71% | -10.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.47% | 27.97% | -12.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.39% | 33.39% | -15.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 35.53% | -14.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 32.86% | -11.75% |
FEZ vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEZ vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEZ and SMH have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.71%) compared to FEZ (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 38.18% vs 11.13% for FEZ. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FEZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 38.18% return vs 11.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
FEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.61 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEZ and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer