PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEZ vs. HEWJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEZ vs. HEWJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly lower than HEWJ's 17.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has underperformed HEWJ with an annualized return of 10.66%, while HEWJ has yielded a comparatively higher 16.30% annualized return.


FEZ

1D
0.63%
1M
0.33%
YTD
4.68%
6M
6.49%
1Y
15.20%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
10.66%

HEWJ

1D
1.25%
1M
1.78%
YTD
17.99%
6M
19.77%
1Y
49.16%
3Y*
27.85%
5Y*
21.09%
10Y*
16.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEZ vs. HEWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
4.68%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%
HEWJ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
17.99%30.25%24.80%36.21%-4.39%12.79%10.29%20.79%-14.68%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FEZ and HEWJ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2014

0.61

The correlation between FEZ and HEWJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.61 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FEZ vs. HEWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEZ
HEWJ

Financial Services

25.1%
17.6%

Industrials

22.1%
26.0%

Technology

16.1%
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
3.6%

Healthcare

5.4%
6.2%

Energy

5.2%
1.1%

Utilities

4.8%
1.1%

Basic Materials

3.7%
3.0%

Communication Services

2.3%
7.9%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Financial Services

FEZ
25.1%
HEWJ
17.6%

Industrials

FEZ
22.1%
HEWJ
26.0%

Technology

FEZ
16.1%
HEWJ
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FEZ
9.8%
HEWJ
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

FEZ
5.5%
HEWJ
3.6%

Healthcare

FEZ
5.4%
HEWJ
6.2%

Energy

FEZ
5.2%
HEWJ
1.1%

Utilities

FEZ
4.8%
HEWJ
1.1%

Basic Materials

FEZ
3.7%
HEWJ
3.0%

Communication Services

FEZ
2.3%
HEWJ
7.9%

Real Estate

FEZ

-

HEWJ
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEZ vs. HEWJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

HEWJ
HEWJ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
HEWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HEWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEZ vs. HEWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEZHEWJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.47

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

4.76

-3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

18.61

-14.80

FEZ vs. HEWJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the HEWJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEZ and HEWJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEZHEWJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

2.61

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

1.11

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.83

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.68

-0.38

Drawdowns

FEZ vs. HEWJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than HEWJ's maximum drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and HEWJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEZHEWJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.21%

-31.53%

-32.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-10.37%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.85%

-20.90%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-20.90%

-14.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-31.53%

-8.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-2.29%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.07%

-6.61%

-10.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

2.65%

+1.35%

Volatility

FEZ vs. HEWJ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) at 5.17%. This indicates that FEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEZHEWJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

5.17%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.06%

14.16%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.11%

18.99%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.64%

19.11%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.12%

19.68%

+1.44%

FEZ vs. HEWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HEWJ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEZ vs. HEWJ - Dividend Comparison

FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than HEWJ's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.58%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
HEWJ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
4.32%5.10%2.20%2.02%47.68%2.03%1.20%2.78%1.37%1.21%1.88%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEZ and HEWJ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEZ has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to HEWJ (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs HEWJ's -31.53%.

On 10-year performance, HEWJ leads with 16.30% vs 10.66% for FEZ. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HEWJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 16.30% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.

HEWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 2.58% for FEZ.

FEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while HEWJ is Japan Equities. FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.49% for HEWJ.

HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEZ and HEWJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer